首页|期刊导航|中国医学装备|超声刀与高频电刀在乳腺癌保乳手术中的临床效果研究

超声刀与高频电刀在乳腺癌保乳手术中的临床效果研究OA

Analysis of clinical application effect of ultrasonic scalpel and high frequency electrotome in BCS for breast cancer

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:对比超声刀与高频电刀在乳腺癌保乳手术中的安全性、有效性及经济性,为临床开展早期乳腺癌治疗提供耗材选择依据.方法:回顾性分析2023年3月至2024年3月内蒙古自治区人民医院收治的120例行乳腺癌保乳手术的女性乳腺癌患者相关资料,根据术中治疗设备的不同将其分为超声刀组和高频电刀组,每组60例.对比两组设备在乳腺癌保乳手术中的安全性、有效性及经济性的指标.结果:超声刀组设备切割功能优良率(96.67%)高于高频电刀组(68.33%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(x2=4.432,P<0.05);两组并发症发生率比较差异有统计学意义(x2=2.261,P<0.05);超声刀组术中出血量、人均住院时间以及人均手术时间均低于高频电刀组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=-4.691、7.438、2.685,P<0.05);超声刀组手术成功率为100.00%,凝血功能优良率为83.33%,操作性能优良率为96.67%;高频电刀组手术成功率为100.00%,凝血功能优良率为81.66%,操作性能优良率为93.33%,与高频电刀组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).超声刀组不良事件发生率为1.67%,高频电刀组不良事件发生率为3.33%,两组安全性指标比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组人均医疗费用比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:超声刀可降低乳腺癌保乳手术并发症发生率、术中出血量、人均住院时间以及人均手术时间,并具备更优的切割功能,从临床应用安全性、有效性和经济性综合考虑,可优先选择使用超声刀进行治疗.

Objective:To compare safety,efficacy and economy of ultrasonic scalpel and high frequency electrotome in breast conserving surgery(BCS)for breast cancer,so as to provide evidence of selecting surgical consumables in conducting clinical treatment for early breast cancer.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 120 patients who underwent BCS for breast cancer at the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital from March 2023 to March 2024.Patients were divided into ultrasonic scalpel group and high frequency electrotome group,with 60 cases in each group.A series of indicators about safety,efficacy and economy of BCS for breast cancer were compared between the two groups.Results:The excellent and good rate(96.67%)of cutting performance in the ultrasonic scalpel group was significantly higher than that(68.33%)in the high frequency electrotome group,and the difference of that between two groups was significant(t=4.432,P<0.05).The difference of the incidence of complications between two groups was significant(x2=2.261,P<0.05).Intraoperative blood loss,average length of hospital stay,and average operation time in the ultrasonic scalpel group were significantly lower than those in the high frequency electrotome group(t=-4.691,7.438,2.685,P<0.05).The successful rate of surgery,excellent and good rate of coagulation function,and excellent and good rate of operative performance of the ultrasonic scalpel group were respectively 100.00%,83.33%and 96.67%.The above indicators of the high-frequency electrotome group were respectively 100.00%,81.66%and 93.33%.The differences of these indicators between two groups were not significant(P>0.05).The incidences of adverse events of the ultrasonic scalpel group and the high-frequency electrotome group were respectively 1.67%and 3.33%,and the difference of that between two groups was significant(P>0.05).Comparison of per capita medical expenses between the two groups,the difference of that between two groups was significant(P>0.05).Conclusion:The ultrasonic scalpel can reduce the incidence of complications,intraoperative blood loss,average length of hospital stay,and average time of surgery,and it has better cutting performance.Depended on the comprehensive consideration about the safety,efficacy and economy of clinical application,ultrasonic scalpel sould be superiorly selected to conduct treatment.

李岳飞;朱丹丹;张晓燕;夏慧琳

内蒙古自治区人民医院医学工程科 呼和浩特 010017内蒙古自治区人民医院医学工程科 呼和浩特 010017内蒙古自治区人民医院医学工程科 呼和浩特 010017内蒙古自治区人民医院医学工程科 呼和浩特 010017

医药卫生

乳腺癌保乳手术超声刀高频电刀真实世界数据

Breast conserving surgery(BCS)for breast cancerUltrasonic scalpelHigh frequency electrotomeReal-world data

《中国医学装备》 2026 (3)

82-85,4

中国医学装备协会应用评价分会课题(2024CAME005) Project of the Application Evaluation Branch of the China Medical Equipment Association(2024CAME005)

10.3969/j.issn.1672-8270.2026.03.015

评论