首页|期刊导航|中国人口·资源与环境|世界主要国家甲烷政策综述及减排进展

世界主要国家甲烷政策综述及减排进展OA

Progress of methane mitigation policies in major countries:a review

中文摘要英文摘要

甲烷是第二大温室气体,其减排已成为全球温室气体减排的重要议题.尽管全球甲烷减排进展加速,近年来大气甲烷浓度仍在持续增长,表明全球甲烷减排政策力度与减排目标之间仍然存在巨大缺口.作为世界上最大的甲烷排放国,中国已经采取了一系列政策措施减少甲烷排放.但是,目前仍然缺乏对中国及其他主要国家甲烷减排政策进展的系统性回顾,也缺少各国甲烷减排难度的对比分析,这使得现有研究对全球甲烷政策进展现状、各国减排成效、未来减排政策着力点等问题仍不清晰.该研究梳理了全球及主要国家甲烷政策进展,并将中国的政策进展与其他主要国家进行对比分析,厘清了当前政策的主要特点和趋势;比较了中国与其他主要国家的各部门甲烷排放强度以及减排成本,分析了在减排难度存在明显差异的前提下,各国的甲烷减排成效是否明显;简单分析了各国未来进一步加强甲烷减排的政策着力点,评估了所需成本,讨论了各国应当如何采取差异化的减排措施以共同削减全球甲烷排放.研究发现,与发达国家相比,中国在甲烷减排方面面临更高的成本和更大的实施难度,但各部门甲烷排放强度已降至接近或低于美国等发达国家的水平.鉴于当前美欧在全球甲烷治理中仍占据主导地位,中国未来将持续面临较大的国际减排行动压力.建议尽早启动甲烷排放控制战略及减排路线图的制定,结合本国国情,系统谋划甲烷减排政策与中长期目标.

Methane is the second most important greenhouse gas,and reducing its emissions is critical for achieving global climate mit‐igation goals.However,despite the accelerated progress of global methane mitigation policies,atmospheric methane concentrations have continued to rise in recent years,suggesting a substantial gap between current policy efforts and expected mitigation outcomes.As the world's largest methane emitter,China has introduced multiple policy measures to curb its methane emissions.Nevertheless,there is still a lack of systematic review of methane mitigation policy progress in China and other major countries,as well as a lack of compar‐ative analysis of the challenges of methane mitigation across countries.Consequently,the current status of global methane governance,the relative effectiveness of national efforts,and future policy priorities remain unclear.This study first reviewed methane mitigation pol‐icies globally and in major countries and compared China's policy progress with that of other major countries to identify key characteris‐tics and evolving trends of current policies.The study further compared the sectoral methane emission intensities and mitigation costs between China and other major countries and analyzed whether countries'mitigation effectiveness was sufficiently strong given the premise that there were obvious differences in mitigation difficulty.Finally,it briefly assessed their future policy priorities and required costs for enhancing methane mitigation in the future and discussed differentiated mitigation pathways that countries should adopt to col‐lectively drive global methane reductions.The study found that although China faces higher costs and greater policy implementation challenges in methane mitigation compared to developed countries,its sectoral methane emission intensities have decreased to levels close to or even lower than those of developed countries such as the United States.Given the continuing dominance of the United States and Europe in global methane governance,China,as the world's largest methane emitter,will continue to face significant international pressure to further reduce methane emissions.Therefore,this study recommends that China should initiate the development of a nation‐al methane mitigation strategy and roadmap as soon as possible,and systematically plan methane mitigation policies and medium-and long-term reduction targets in accordance with its national conditions.

刘强;滕飞

清华大学能源环境经济研究所,北京 100084清华大学能源环境经济研究所,北京 100084

资源环境

甲烷减排政策进展政策比较

methane mitigationpolicy progresspolicy comparison

《中国人口·资源与环境》 2026 (1)

77-88,12

国家重点研发计划项目"农业生产非二氧化碳温室气体减排战略及技术合作研发与应用"(批准号:2022YFE0209200).

10.12062/cpre.20251023

评论