首页|期刊导航|中国人口·资源与环境|生态环境权益的理性认知与体系化解释

生态环境权益的理性认知与体系化解释OA

Rational cognition and systematic interpretation of ecological and environmental rights and interests

中文摘要英文摘要

《中华人民共和国生态环境法典(草案)》对"保障公众健康和生态环境权益"作出明确规定,在中国生态环境立法中首次一定程度上回应了多年来相关理论研究中"环境权入法"的设想.但是,环境权益并不等同于环境权,环境权益作为环境权"借代"进入立法是否具有可行性和必要性,如何对环境权益做出符合法理逻辑的理论阐释,成为生态环境法典编纂背景下重要的理论研究命题.通过释义分析可以看出,生态环境权益主体指向多样、利益结构复杂、以美丽为导向的利益诉求主观性强且范围难以量化,这些特征决定了生态环境权益并不具有"可获得性",因此,生态环境权益实质上是侧重于利益的立法表达,环境权因不具有"可获得性"的利益基础而难以直接入法,《中华人民共和国生态环境法典(草案)》对生态环境权益的规定是对"环境权入法"理论设想的务实回应.为确立对生态环境权益具有评价一致性和内在统一性的法秩序,需要对其进行体系化解释.对生态环境权益的体系化解释,应遵循从政治话语到法学话语转化、不同立法之间的衔接与支持、立法与司法协同的思路.把生态环境权益作为与客观法相呼应的主观权利的利益基础,使《中华人民共和国生态环境法典(草案)》与生态文明入宪形成结构性衔接.将生态环境权益纳入以人格尊严为基础的一般人格权予以保护,推动《中华人民共和国生态环境法典(草案)》与《中华人民共和国民法典》的双向赋能.通过从环境公益和环境私益两个不同层面对生态环境权益规范功能的解释和阐明,可为中国环境司法专门化的发展提供充分的法律基础.

The Ecological and Environmental Code of the People's Republic of China(Draft)explicitly stipulates"safeguarding public health as well as ecological and environmental rights and interests,"representing,for the first time in China's ecological and environ‐mental legislation,a partial response to the long-standing theoretical proposition of"incorporating environmental rights into law."How‐ever,environmental rights and interests are not equivalent to environmental rights.Whether it is feasible and necessary to introduce en‐vironmental rights and interests as a synecdoche for environmental rights into legislation,and how to provide a theoretically coherent in‐terpretation of environmental rights and interests in line with legal logic,have become critical theoretical research issues in the context of codifying the Ecological and Environmental Code.Doctrinal analysis reveals that the subjects of ecological and environmental rights and interests are diverse,their interest structure is complex,and their beauty-oriented claims are highly subjective and difficult to quan‐tify.These characteristics determine that ecological and environmental rights and interests lack"availability."Therefore,they essential‐ly represent a legislative expression focused on interests.Environmental rights,due to their lack of an interest foundation based on"availability,"are difficult to directly incorporate directly into law.The provisions on ecological and environmental rights and interests in the Ecological and Environmental Code of the People's Republic of China(Draft)represent a pragmatic response to the theoretical proposition of"incorporating environmental rights into law."To establish a legal order characterized by evaluative consistency and in‐ternal uniformity regarding ecological and environmental rights and interests,a systematic interpretation is necessary.This systematic interpretation should follow an approach that transforms political discourse into legal discourse,ensures articulation and support be‐tween different legislative processes,and promotes legislative-judicial coordination.By treating ecological and environmental rights and interests as the interest foundation of subjective rights corresponding to objective law,the Ecological and Environmental Code of the People's Republic of China(Draft)can structurally align with the constitutional incorporation of ecological civilization.Incorporating ecological and environmental rights and interests into the protection of general personality rights based on human dignity promotes mu‐tual empowerment between the Ecological and Environmental Code of the People's Republic of China(Draft)and the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.By interpreting and clarifying the normative function of ecological and environmental rights and interests from the two distinct dimensions of public and private environmental interests,a solid legal foundation can be provided for the special‐ized development of environmental adjudication in China.

张璐

华东政法大学经济法学院,上海 200042

社会科学

生态环境权益生态环境法典体系化解释立法与司法协同

ecological and environmental rights and interestsEcological and Environmental Codesystematic interpretationlegislative‐judicial coordination

《中国人口·资源与环境》 2026 (1)

37-46,10

10.12062/cpre.20251102

评论