行业自然垄断环节独立运营与竞争性环节市场化改革:改革历程、现实挑战与战略路径OACHSSCD
Independent Operation of Natural Monopoly Segments and Market-Oriented Reform of Competitive Segments in Key Industries:Reform Evolution,Practical Challenges,and Strategic Pathways
党的二十届三中全会明确提出,"推进能源、铁路、电信、水利、公用事业等行业自然垄断环节独立运营和竞争性环节市场化改革".这一重大部署为中国基础性行业体制机制创新指明了方向,也为完善社会主义市场经济体制、推进中国式现代化提供了制度支撑.自然垄断行业改革既是实现经济高质量发展的内在要求,也是应对新阶段要素约束、结构调整与风险防控挑战的战略举措.随着现代产业体系加快构建,行业治理模式、产权结构、竞争格局与监管体系正面临系统性重塑,亟须以体制机制创新为抓手,构建高效、公平、安全、可持续的治理新格局. 聚焦"自然垄断环节独立运营"和"竞争性环节市场化改革"两个核心维度,系统梳理中国自然垄断行业从政企分开、管办分离到混合所有制改革的渐进式演进历程,揭示了中国在公共属性与效率目标平衡中,通过纵向分离、横向竞争与监管重塑逐步实现从行政垄断向市场治理转型的制度逻辑.同时,结合英国、美国、法国等国家的改革经验,指出西方国家普遍以放松管制、纵向分离和建立独立监管体系为核心路径,在效率导向与公共性保障之间形成多样化平衡,为中国深化改革提供了比较借鉴与制度启示. 进一步研究发现,在改革深化过程中仍面临四大现实挑战:一是垄断与竞争边界难以科学甄别,传统划分标准行政化、静态化,数字经济又使垄断呈现动态性与隐蔽性;二是垄断环节的监管独立性不足,行政依附性强、权责不清、专业支撑薄弱,导致监管碎片化、协同缺失;三是竞争环节的市场化进程受限,准入机制行政化、价格形成与交易体系市场化不足,资源配置效率低、政策干预频仍;四是纵向分离后协同不畅,两环节在利益分配、信息衔接与风险分担上脱节,整体效率受损.针对现实挑战,提出三条战略路径:第一,构建以效率提升、安全保障、绩效考核与监管协同为支撑的"四位一体"独立运营体系,通过明确产权边界与责任机制,使企业在保持公共属性的同时实现自主经营与自我约束;第二,建立以企业改制、市场准入、竞争规则与政策协调为核心的"四维一体"市场化改革路径,通过完善竞争环境与政策体系,激发行业创新活力与资源配置效率;第三,构建产业链、价值链和供应链"三维协同"机制,实现自然垄断环节与竞争性环节的有机衔接与动态平衡,推动行业运行由结构分割走向系统协同.在理论上丰富了自然垄断行业改革的制度分析框架,在实践上为重点行业体制机制创新提供了可参考的系统化、可操作的中国方案.
The Third Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee explicitly proposed to"advance the independent operation of natural monopoly segments and the market-oriented reform of competitive segments in industries such as energy,railways,telecommunications,water conservancy,and public utilities".This major policy direction provides clear guidance for institutional innovation in China's fundamental industries and offers institutional support for improving the socialist market economy and promoting Chinese modernization.Reforming natural monopoly industries is not only an intrinsic requirement for achieving high-quality economic development but also a strategic response to new challenges in factor constraints,structural adjustment,and risk prevention.As the modern industrial system accelerates its formation,the governance model,ownership structure,competitive landscape,and regulatory framework of these industries are undergoing systemic transformation,calling for institutional innovation to build an efficient,fair,secure,and sustainable governance system.Focusing on two core dimensions—"independent operation of natural monopoly segments"and"market-oriented reform of competitive segments"—this paper systematically reviews China's gradual reform process from the separation of government and enterprises,through the division of regulation and operation,to the deepening of mixed-ownership reform.It reveals how China has progressively transitioned from administrative monopoly to market-oriented governance by balancing public welfare and efficiency objectives through vertical separation,horizontal competition,and regulatory restructuring.Drawing on the reform experiences of the United Kingdom,the United States,and France,this study highlights that major Western economies generally adopted deregulation,vertical unbundling,and the establishment of independent regulatory agencies as their core reform paths,achieving diverse balances between efficiency and public interest.These international experiences offer valuable comparative insights for deepening China's ongoing reform.The study further identifies four key challenges in China's reform process:difficulties in distinguishing between monopoly and competitive boundaries,insufficient regulatory independence in monopoly segments,limited marketization of competitive segments,and coordination inefficiencies following vertical separation.In response,this paper proposes three strategic pathways:(1)establishing a"four-in-one"independent operation system supported by efficiency enhancement,safety assurance,performance evaluation,and regulatory coordination;(2)developing a"four-dimensional"market-oriented reform framework centered on corporate restructuring,market access,competition rules,and policy coordination;and(3)constructing a"three-dimensional"coordination mechanism across industrial,value,and supply chains to achieve organic linkage and dynamic balance between monopoly and competitive segments.Theoretically,this research enriches the institutional analytical framework of natural monopoly industry reform,while practically,it provides a systematic and operable Chinese approach for advancing institutional innovation in key sectors.
温军;杨竞豪
西安交通大学 经济与金融学院,陕西 西安 710049西安交通大学 经济与金融学院,陕西 西安 710049
管理科学
社会主义市场经济体制自然垄断行业独立运营行业治理市场化改革政企关系基础性行业体制机制创新
socialist market economy systemnatural monopoly industriesindependent operationindustry governancemarket-oriented reformgovernment-enterprise relationsinstitutional and governance innovation in foundational industries
《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (1)
123-139,17
研究阐释党的二十届三中全会精神国家社会科学基金重大专项项目(24ZDA011).
评论