桑叶育蚕/饲料育蚕生丝HPLC指纹图谱的构建与应用OA
Construction of HPLC fingerprints for silkworm cocoons reared on mulberry leaves and artificial diet and their application
为建立高效的桑叶育蚕/饲料育蚕生丝鉴别方法,通过HPLC对产地、茧期不同的桑叶育蚕/饲料育蚕生丝的水溶性微量成分进行分析,并采用相似度评价与系统聚类分析法对获取的HPLC图谱数据进行研究.构建了两类生丝的HPLC指纹图谱,以此为参照,用系统聚类分析法对商品化生丝盲样进行判定,检验了该指纹图谱的有效性.结果表明:同茧期不同产地的桑叶育蚕生丝间的相似度均高于 0.86,饲料育蚕生丝间相似度则超过 0.96,说明两种生丝的HPLC图谱具备良好的一致性.系统聚类分析时,当欧氏距离的平方大于 12,可实现桑叶育蚕/饲料育蚕生丝的区分.HPLC指纹图谱库结合聚类分析法分析未知生丝产品,有望为精准判定样品的桑叶育蚕/饲料育蚕生丝身份属性提供重要参考.
Rearing silkworms with artificial feed represents a crucial development direction for the future of the sericulture and silk industry.However,currently,the cocoon silk produced by silkworms reared on artificial feed throughout all instars falls short of that produced by silkworms reared on mulberry leaves in terms of luster,fiber strength,and overall quality,making it difficult to serve as the preferred raw material for high-end silk products.At present,some merchants on the market engage in the improper practice of passing off cocoon silk from silkworms reared on artificial feed throughout all instars as that from silkworms reared on mulberry leaves.Such practices not only disrupt the order of the raw silk market but also compromise product quality reliability.Therefore,establishing accurate and reliable methods for distinguishing between cocoon silk produced by silkworms reared on mulberry leaves and those reared on artificial feed throughout all instars has become a critical task for the cocoon and silk industry to ensure product quality and maintain market norms. In this study,high-performance liquid chromatography(HPLC)technology was employed to analyze the water-soluble trace components of raw silk from silkworms reared on mulberry leaves and those reared on artificial feed throughout all instars under different cocooning stages,origins,and silk-reeling processes.Furthermore,similarity evaluation and cluster analysis methods were applied to comprehensively analyze the obtained HPLC fingerprints comparing the differences in trace components between the two types of silk samples.Additionally,HPLC fingerprint and cluster analysis models were established separately for silk from silkworms reared on mulberry leaves and those reared on artificial feed.Finally,the accuracy of these methods in distinguishing between the two types of silk was verified through testing commercial raw silk samples.The study yielded several conclusions.The types of trace components in silk produced by silkworms reared on artificial feed throughout all instars are not significantly difference from those in silk produced by silkworms reared on ordinary mulberry leaves.However,the relative contents of these trace components are notably lower in the full-instar artificially-fed silk,as evidenced by significantly lower peak heights in its HPLC chromatograms.The HPLC chromatograms of silk samples produced by silkworms reared on artificial feed throughout all instars are highly similar among themselves,whereas the chromatographic profiles of silk samples produced by silkworms reared on ordinary mulberry leaves show marked differences.For raw silk produced by mulberry-leaf-reared silkworms from different origins but within the same cocooning period,the similarity indices all exceed 0.86.In contrast,the similarity indices among full-instar artificially-fed raw silk samples surpass 0.96,indicating good consistency in the trace components contained within this type of raw silk.The cocooning period is the primary factor influencing the chromatographic profiles of silk produced by mulberry-leaf-reared silkworms,followed by the origin.Cluster analysis can differentiate between silk produced by silkworms reared on artificial feed throughout all instars and that produced by mulberry-leaf-reared silkworms,and can further determine the cocooning period information of the mulberry-leaf-reared silk.By extracting the common HPLC chromatographic peaks from both mulberry-leaf-reared silk and full-instar artificially-fed silk,HPLC fingerprints were constructed for these two types of silk.These fingerprints were then utilized as reference patterns for systematic cluster analysis of blind samples.Results demonstrate that it is feasible to distinguish between raw silk products from mulberry-leaf-reared silkworms and those from silkworms reared on artificial feed throughout all instars. Overall,the HPLC fingerprint and cluster analysis methods established in this study are accurate and reliable for distinguishing between silk produced by mulberry-leaf-reared silkworms and that produced by artificially-fed silkworms.
周文娟;赵栋;叶飞;马明波;周文龙
浙江理工大学纺织科学与工程学院(国际丝绸学院),浙江 杭州 310018浙江省检验检疫科学技术研究院,浙江 杭州 311200湖州市质量技术监督检测研究院(湖州市纤维质量监测中心),浙江 湖州 313000浙江理工大学纺织科学与工程学院(国际丝绸学院),浙江 杭州 310018浙江理工大学纺织科学与工程学院(国际丝绸学院),浙江 杭州 310018
轻工纺织
饲料育蚕生丝鉴别HPLC指纹图谱相似度评价系统聚类分析
artificially-fed silkwormsraw silk identificationHPLC fingerprintsimilarity evaluationsystematic cluster analysis
《现代纺织技术》 2026 (3)
40-46,7
湖州市科技计划项目(2023GZ11)
评论