基于静态和动态线索的人脸深度伪造的检测方法及其特点OA
A method for detecting facial depth-forge created by static and dynamic clues and its characteristics
随着深度学习技术的发展以及生成式人工智能的迅速兴起,人脸伪造技术的生成质量不断提升,其潜在滥用风险也日益受到关注.本文对相关领域的研究进行了系统总结,介绍了目前的人脸深度伪造的检测方法,并将其按照线索分为静态检测方法与动态检测方法.其中静态检测方法包括显性逻辑矛盾检测方法与深层特征差异检测方法,静态检测方法通过辨别伪造图像或视频与原始图像或视频各方面的不同之处而发现伪造痕迹,动态检测方法主要对视频的时序特征以及不同的模态之间进行研究.此外,还梳理了常见的人脸伪造方法、伪造人脸图像及视频的数据集等,并对主动检测策略与提升泛化能力进行了深入探讨.
With the rapid development of deep learning technology and the swift rise of generative artificial intelligence,the quality of face forgery generation has continuously improved,and its potential risks of misuse have attracted increasing attention.This paper,which makes a systematic review of research in the related field,introduces the existing face deepfake detection methods and categorizes them according to detection cues into static detection methods and dynamic detection methods.Static detection methods include explicit logical inconsistency detection and deep feature discrepancy detection,which identify forgery traces by analyzing various differences between forged images or videos and authentic ones.In contrast,dynamic detection methods mainly focus on the temporal characteristics of videos and the consistency across different modalities.In addition,this paper reviews common face forgery techniques as well as widely used datasets for forged face images and videos,and conducts an in-depth discussion on active detection strategies and approaches for improving generalization capability.
孙越涵;毛施云;李慧斌
西安交通大学数学与统计学院,陕西 西安 710049西安交通大学数学与统计学院,陕西 西安 710049西安交通大学数学与统计学院,陕西 西安 710049
信息技术与安全科学
人脸深度伪造检测静态检测动态检测伪造数据集泛化能力
face deepfake detectionstatic detectiondynamic detectionforgery datasetgeneralization ability
《西安交通大学学报(医学版)》 2026 (2)
224-233,10
西安交通大学基本科研业务费自由探索与创新类项目(No.xzy012023035)Supported in part by Central University Basic Research Fund of China(No.xzy012023035)
评论