地下水埋深与覆被类型对土壤水分动态调控协同效应OA
The synergistic effect of groundwater depth and cover type on the dynamics of soil moisture
为探讨毛乌素沙地地下水埋深对不同覆被类型土壤水分动态和分布的影响,以毛乌素沙地东南缘的地下水浅埋区(2 m)和深埋区(10 m)为研究地,分别设置裸地、草地及沙柳地3种典型覆被类型.通过野外采样与HYDRUS-1D数值模拟,分析了地下水埋深对不同覆被类型土壤水分分布动态的影响,量化了 3种植被样地间的蒸散发强度、底部(150 cm处)水分交换与保蓄水能力的差异.结果表明:地下水深埋区土壤水分动态受降水与蒸发驱动波动显著,而浅埋区因地下水可通过毛细带长期补给维持稳定状态.地下水埋深与覆被类型对土壤水分动态的协同调控作用显著,表现为在458 mm降雨条件下,深埋区蒸散发损失呈草地最大(427 mm)、沙柳地次之(395 mm)、裸地最小(284 mm);相比之下,浅埋区由于地下水的支持补给,沙柳和草地会消耗部分地下水,因此其蒸散发损失(沙柳590 mm;草地620 mm)远大于深埋区.此外,覆被类型显著调节土壤水分的再分配,研究期草地和沙柳地根区40~60 cm深度土壤含水量最低,深埋区与浅埋区分别为0.02及0.05 cm3·cm-3.相比之下,裸地则表现出更高的土壤含水量,深埋区和浅埋区分别为0.05及0.08 cm3·cm-3.浅埋区植被通过吸收包气带和饱和带水,蒸散增大,而深埋区植被完全依赖非饱和带的土壤水,蒸散发受限.在覆被类型中,草地表现出最高的蒸散和最低的渗漏量,表明草地在短期内具有显著高的水分利用效率和蒸散调控能力.然而,这种高蒸散和低渗漏特性可能限制其对地下水储备的补给能力,影响长期水源涵养功能.因此,在生态管理与植被恢复过程中,需要综合考虑地下水埋深与覆被类型的协同作用,优化植被配置,以平衡水资源利用效率与水源涵养功能.
To explore the effects of groundwater depth on soil moisture dynamics and distribution of different land cover types in Mu Us Sandy Land,we examine the hydrology dynamics across three typical land cover types(bare land,grassland and Salix psammophila land)under the shallow buried area(2 m)and deep buried area(10 m)of groundwater in the southeastern margin of Mu Us Sandy Land.Through field sampling and HYDRUS-1D numeri-cal simulation,we analyzed the effects of groundwater depth on soil moisture distribution dynamics of different vege-tation types,as well as the differences of evapotranspiration intensity,bottom(150 cm)water exchange and water storage capacity among three vegetation types.The results showed that the soil moisture dynamics in the deep buried area of groundwater were significantly driven by precipitation and evaporation,while the shallow buried area main-tained a stable state due to the long-term recharge of groundwater through the capillary zone.There were significant synergistic interactions between groundwater depth and cover type on soil moisture dynamics.Under the 458 mm rainfall condition,the evapotranspiration loss in deep buried area was the largest in grassland(427 mm),followed by Salix psammpphila land(395 mm)and bare land(284 mm).In contrast,due to the support and replenishment of groundwater in shallow buried areas,Salix psammpphila land and grasslands consumed groundwater,resulting in higher evapotranspiration losses(590 mm for Salix psammpphila land and 620 mm for grassland)than deep burial area.In addition,cover type significantly affected the redistribution of soil moisture.Soil water content at 40-60 cm depth in the root zone of grassland and Salix psammophila land was the lowest in the study period,which was 0.02 and 0.05 cm3·cm-3 in the deep buried area and shallow buried area,respectively.In contrast,the bare land showed higher soil water content,the deep buried area and shallow buried area were 0.05 and 0.08 cm3·cm-3,re-spectively.The vegetation in the shallow buried area increased evapotranspiration by absorbing water from the enve-lope zone and the saturated zone,while the vegetation in the deep buried area completely depended on soil water in the unsaturated zone,and the evapotranspiration was limited.Among the cover types,grassland showed the highest evapotranspiration and the lowest leakage,indicating that grassland had significantly higher water use efficiency and evapotranspiration regulation ability in the short term.However,this high evapotranspiration and low leakage char-acteristics may limit its capacity to recharge groundwater reserves and affect long-term water conservation.There-fore,it is necessary to comprehensively consider the synergistic effect of groundwater depth and cover type in the process of ecological management and vegetation restoration,and optimize vegetation configuration to balance water use efficiency and water conservation.
曹庆喜;刘祖钰;陈云飞;石长春;郭浩壮;景伊卓;贺军奇;刘秀花
陕西省林业科学院,西安 710082||陕西榆林毛乌素沙地生态系统定位观测研究站,陕西榆林 719000长安大学水利与环境学院,西安 710054||旱区地下水与生态效应教育部重点实验室,西安 710054||水利部旱区生态水文与水安全重点实验室,西安 710054长安大学水利与环境学院,西安 710054||旱区地下水与生态效应教育部重点实验室,西安 710054||水利部旱区生态水文与水安全重点实验室,西安 710054陕西省林业科学院,西安 710082||陕西榆林毛乌素沙地生态系统定位观测研究站,陕西榆林 719000枣庄市水利勘测设计院,山东枣庄 277800长安大学水利与环境学院,西安 710054||旱区地下水与生态效应教育部重点实验室,西安 710054||水利部旱区生态水文与水安全重点实验室,西安 710054长安大学水利与环境学院,西安 710054||旱区地下水与生态效应教育部重点实验室,西安 710054||水利部旱区生态水文与水安全重点实验室,西安 710054长安大学水利与环境学院,西安 710054||旱区地下水与生态效应教育部重点实验室,西安 710054||水利部旱区生态水文与水安全重点实验室,西安 710054
地下水埋深覆被类型土壤水分动态HYDRUS-1D毛乌素沙地
groundwater depthcover typesoil water dynamicsHYDRUS-1DMu Us Sandy Land
《生态学杂志》 2026 (2)
544-553,10
国家自然科学基金项目(42372288,41877179,42202279)和中央高校基本科研业务费项目(300102292904,300102294903,300102294723)资助.
评论