刺血拔罐联合CT引导下脉冲射频治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛的疗效观察OA
Observations on the efficacy of pricking-cupping bloodletting plus CT-guided pulsed radiofrequency for postherpetic neuralgia
目的 观察刺血拔罐联合 CT 引导下脉冲射频治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛(postherpetic neuralgia,PHN)的临床疗效.方法 将PHN患者100例,采用信封法随机分为脉冲射频组和综合组,每组50例.脉冲射频组给予CT引导下脉冲射频治疗,综合组在脉冲射频组基础上给予刺血拔罐治疗.记录两组疼痛开始缓解时间、红肿消退时间,评估两组匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(Pittsburgh sleep quality index,PSQI)评分、疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analog scale,VAS)评分、皮肤病生活质量指数(dermatology life quality index,DLQI)评分变化,检测两组血浆瞬时受体电位阳离子通道 V 亚家族成员 1(transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1,TRPV1)、降钙素基因相关肽(calcitonin gene related peptide,CGRP)和β-内啡肽(β-Endorphin,β-EP)水平、静脉血TRPV1 mRNA、体感诱发电位值,并比较两组的临床疗效和痊愈患者复发率.结果 综合组疼痛开始缓解时间及红肿消退时间均短于脉冲射频组(P<0.05).治疗后,两组疼痛VAS评分、PSQI评分和DLQI评分均低于治疗前(P<0.05),且综合组低于脉冲射频组(P<0.05).治疗后,两组血浆TRPV1 和静脉血TRPV1 mRNA均低于治疗前,且综合组低于脉冲射频组(P<0.05).治疗后,两组体感诱发电位值和血浆CGRP水平均低于治疗前(P<0.05),且综合组低于脉冲射频组(P<0.05).治疗后,两组血浆β-EP 水平高于治疗前(P<0.05),且综合组高于脉冲射频组(P<0.05).综合组总有效率高于脉冲射频组(P<0.05).综合组治疗后 3 个月复发率与脉冲射频组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).综合组治疗后 6 个月复发率低于脉冲射频组(P<0.05).结论 刺血拔罐联合CT引导下脉冲射频治疗PHN疗效较好,可抑制疼痛,改善睡眠,减少复发.
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of pricking-cupping bloodletting plus CT-guided pulsed radiofrequency for postherpetic neuralgia(PHN).Method One hundred PNH patients were randomized,using the envelope method,to pulsed radiofrequency and comprehensive groups,with 50 cases in each group.The pulsed radiofrequency group received treatment with CT-guided pulsed radiofrequency and the comprehensive group,pricking-cupping bloodletting in addition.Time for pain relief to begin,time for redness and swelling to subside,the Pittsburgh sleep quality index(PSQI)score,the pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score and the dermatology life quality index(DLQI)score were recorded and plasma levels of transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1(TRPV1),calcitonin gene related peptide(CGRP)and β-Endorphin(β-EP),venous blood TRPV1 mRNA and somatosensory evoked potential were measured in the two groups.The clinical therapeutic effect and the recurrence rate in the recovered patients were compared between the two groups.Result Time for pain relief to begin and time for redness and swelling to subside were shorter in the comprehensive group than in the pulsed radiofrequency group(P<0.05).After treatment,the VAS,PSQI and DLQI scores decreased in the two groups compared with before(P<0.05)and were lower in the comprehensive group than in the pulsed radiofrequency group(P<0.05).After treatment,plasma TRPV1 and venous blood TRPV1 mRNA decreased in the two groups compared with before(P<0.05)and were lower in the comprehensive group than in the pulsed radiofrequency group(P<0.05).After treatment,somatosensory evoked potential and plasma CGRP levels decreased in the two groups compared with before(P<0.05)and were lower in the comprehensive group than in the pulsed radiofrequency group(P<0.05).After treatment,plasma β-EP levels increased in the two groups compared with before(P<0.05)and was higher in the comprehensive group than in the pulsed radiofrequency group(P<0.05).The total efficacy rate was higher in the comprehensive group than in the pulsed radiofrequency group(P<0.05).The recurrence rate had no statistically significant difference between the comprehensive and pulsed radiofrequency groups at three months after treatment(P>0.05).The recurrence rate was lower in the comprehensive group than in the pulsed radiofrequency group at six months after treatment(P<0.05).Conclusion Pricking-cupping bloodletting plus CT-guided pulsed radiofrequency is more effective in treating PHN.It can relieve the pain,improve sleep and reduce the recurrence.
杨利娟;荆楠;吴凡;王玉静;张萌
河北中石油中心医院,廊坊 065000河北中石油中心医院,廊坊 065000河北中石油中心医院,廊坊 065000河北中石油中心医院,廊坊 065000河北中石油中心医院,廊坊 065000
医药卫生
刺络拔罐疗法脉冲射频神经痛,带状疱疹后匹兹堡睡眠质量指数皮肤病生活质量指数
Pricking-cupping bloodletting therapyPulsed radiofrequencyNeuralgia,postherpeticThe Pittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexThe Dermatology Life Quality Index
《上海针灸杂志》 2026 (3)
234-239,6
廊坊市科学技术研究与发展计划项目(2024013106)
评论