首页|期刊导航|南京航空航天大学学报(英文版)|一种高鲁棒性襟翼倾斜探测监控器设计

一种高鲁棒性襟翼倾斜探测监控器设计OA

Design of a High-Robustness Flap Skew Detection Monitoring Threshold

中文摘要英文摘要

本文以民用飞机襟翼倾斜探测系统为对象,针对监控器鲁棒性不足,会导致虚警影响航线运营的问题,提出了一种高鲁棒性倾斜探测监控器的设计方法.为了解决该问题,本文采用有限元分析、概率统计、故障树分析等多种方法相结合.首先根据襟翼倾斜探测的原理和阈值设计原则,确定了在翼面倾斜后最大受载下的变形量为阈值上限,以传感器误差量及正常飞行的形变量为下限的阈值范围.由于正常飞行中两侧襟翼变形量之差max Δλ所处的载荷工况较为复杂,难以通过理论计算确定,本文采用了概率统计原理,运用Gumbel极值分布律对大量试飞数据进行了分析,通过K-S假设检验确定了置信度,形成了max Δλ的概率密度函数.继而通过max Δλ的累积概率值,得到了阈值与虚警率的关系曲线.之后基于系统安全性分析和派遣率分析确定了虚警率的边界条件,根据边界条件反推计算得到监控阈值的目标解.经与有限元分析数据及铁鸟试验台襟翼倾斜试验数据比对,监控阈值的目标解得到确认,结果符合设计预期,证明了本方法的合理性.

Focusing on civil aircraft flap skew detection design,this paper proposes a high-robustness monitoring design methodology to address insufficient monitor robustness that may trigger false alarms and disrupt airline operations.Based on flap skew detection principles and threshold design criteria,the threshold range is defined with upper limit of maximum deformation under aerodynamic load and lower limit of sensor error margin and nominal flight deformation.Since the complex loading conditions of maximum flap differential deformation(max Δλ)during normal flight cannot be theoretically determined,probabilistic methods are employed:Flight test data from hundreds of sorties are analyzed using generalized extreme value distribution.Confidence levels are verified via Kolmogorov-Smirnov(K-S)hypothesis testing.Then probability density function of max Δλ is established.The false alarm rate is calculated through cumulative probability values of max Δλ at varying thresholds.Boundary conditions for false alarm rate are determined by safety assessment and dispatch reliability analysis.The derived monitoring threshold is verified against finite element analysis predictions and iron bird rig test.The results confirm the methodology's validity,meeting all design objectives.

田金强;童明波;薛瀛

上海飞机设计研究院,上海 200210,中国||南京航空航天大学航空学院,南京 210016,中国南京航空航天大学航空学院,南京 210016,中国上海飞机设计研究院,上海 200210,中国

信息技术与安全科学

襟翼倾斜探测极值分布假设检验虚警率

flapskew detectionextreme distributionhypothesis testfalse alarm rate

《南京航空航天大学学报(英文版)》 2026 (1)

73-84,12

10.16356/j.1005-1120.2026.01.006

评论