互层岩体理论研究和试验分析进展述评OA
Advances in the Theoretical Research and Experimental Analysis of Interbedded Rock Masses
与单一岩体相比,互层岩体具有非均质性和各向异性等特性,其力学性质和破坏机理更为复杂,相应的理论研究和试验分析也更为繁杂.本文梳理了互层岩体在结构、各向异性、本构模型、试样获取和破坏机理五个方面的研究进展.建议未来在以下几个方面加强研究:一是理论建模与多尺度分析,发展本构和数值模型,研究细观结构与宏观力学行为的传递关系;二是试验技术创新,开展大型试验,纳入环境因素,优化试样制备方法;三是工程应用研究,将理论成果融入工程设计,制定相关规范,开发风险评估工具;四是通过结合数值模拟技术和机器学习算法,构建高精度模型,结合地质数据实现数字孪生模拟,预测岩石的强度和变形特性.
Compared to homogeneous rock masses,interbedded rock masses exhibit characteristics such as heterogeneity and anisotropy,resulting in more complex mechanical properties and failure mechanisms.Consequently,both theoretical studies and experimental analysis become considerably more intricate.This paper reviews research progress in interbedded rock masses across five key aspects:structural characteristic,anisotropy,constitutive models,sample acquisition,and failure mechanisms.It is suggested that future research should focus on strengthening the following areas:First,theoretical modeling and multiscale analysis:developing constitutive and numerical models to investigate the relationship between microstructure and macroscopic mechanical behavior.Second,innovation in experimental techniques:conducting large-scale tests,incorporating environmental factors,and optimizing specimen preparation methods.Third,research on engineering applications:integrating theoretical findings into engineering design,establishing standards,and developing risk assessment tools.Fourth,combining numerical simulation technology with machine learning algorithms to construct high-precision models,implementing digital twin simulations with combining geological data,and predicting the strength and deformation characteristics of rock masses.These suggestions may provide insights for subsequent research on interbedded rock mass.
李嘉乐;史啸;苏传奇
青岛科技大学 机电工程学院,山东 青岛 266061青岛科技大学 机电工程学院,山东 青岛 266061青岛科技大学 机电工程学院,山东 青岛 266061
天文与地球科学
互层岩体岩体结构各向异性本构模型试样获取破坏机理
interbedded rock massrock mass structureanisotropyconstitutive modelsample acquisitionfailure mechanism
《华南地质》 2026 (1)
158-175,18
评论