组合湿地应用于池塘养殖尾水处理的比较研究OA
Comparative study of combined wetlands for pond aquaculture wastewater treatment
为探究"池塘+人工湿地"组合湿地应用于池塘养殖尾水的处理效果,本研究针对"水平潜流+表面流湿地(组合A)"、"稻田+生态沟渠+生态塘湿地(组合B)"和"复合垂直流湿地(组合C)"三组不同工艺组合湿地分别与鱼塘结合构建三套循环水养殖系统,对其在去除池塘养殖尾水中悬浮物(TSS)、高锰酸盐指数(CODMn)、总磷(TP)、总氮(TN)等主要污染物的去除效果进行比较.结果显示:三组不同工艺湿地对上述污染物均有显著去除效果,出水水质均达到或低于SC/T 9101-2007《淡水池塘养殖水排放要求》限值.从面积去除率看,组合A对CODMn 和TN的面积去除率最高,分别为 15.54、4.63 g/(m2·d),组合C对TSS和TP的面积去除率最高,分别为 141.68、0.65 g/(m2·d);从组合湿地占池塘面积配比看,组合 A占 9.2%,组合 B占 49.3%,组合 C 占16.3%;从湿地建设成本看,组合A、C较高,组合B最低.综上可见,不同工艺组合湿地应用于尾水处理表现出不同特点,实际应用中应坚持因地制宜原则.
"Pond+Constructed Wetland"is an effective technology model for aquaculture wastewater treat-ment.Three sets of wetlands with different process combinations were combined with ponds to create three re-circulating aquaculture systems,which have been in operation for several years.With the designed daily water treatment volume set at 15%of the pond water capacity,we conducted a comparative study on the purification and reuse effects of three different wetland combinations:"horizontal subsurface flow+surface flow construc-ted wetland(Combination A)","paddy field+ecological ditch+ecological pond constructed wetland(Combi-nation B)"and"integrated vertical flow constructed wetland(Combination C)".The results showed signifi-cant removal effects on the primary pollutants of pond aquaculture wastewater,such as total suspended solids(TSS),permanganate index(CODMn),total phosphorus(TP)and total nitrogen(TN),with the effluent water quality meeting the current"Requirements for Discharge of Freshwater Pond Aquaculture Water"(SC/T 9101-2007).Combination A had the highest area removal rates for CODMn and TN at 15.54 and 4.63 g/(m2·d),respectively.In contrast,Combination C had the highest area removal rate for TSS and TP,at 141.68 and 0.65 g/(m2·d),respectively.The systems composed of subsurface flow wetlands had lower ratios of the com-bined purification units to pond area,with 9.2%for Combination A and 16.3%for Combination C,compared to 49.3%for the system composed of paddy field wetlands.Regarding construction costs,Combination A was the most expensive,followed by Combination C,with Combination B being the least costly.Therefore,sub-surface wetland systems are more suitable for aquaculture areas with developed economies,land resource short-ages,and high environmental loads,and can also be used as end-of-pipe treatment for aquaculture wastewater.Paddy fields were ideal for the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and southern plain rice-growing areas,providing a good ecological model of"increasing income,saving water,and reducing e-missions"through integrated planting and aquaculture.In practice,the appropriate wetland process combination should be selected based on local conditions,considering both wastewater purification effectiveness and con-struction and operational costs.
彭格格;陶玲;郑颖强;周家祺;吕永全;李谷;张辉
上海海洋大学水产与生命学院,上海 201306||中国水产科学研究院长江水产研究所,武汉 430223中国水产科学研究院长江水产研究所,武汉 430223中国水产科学研究院长江水产研究所,武汉 430223长江大学生命科学学院,湖北 荆州 434025长江大学生命科学学院,湖北 荆州 434025中国水产科学研究院长江水产研究所,武汉 430223中国水产科学研究院长江水产研究所,武汉 430223
农业科技
人工湿地循环水养殖系统池塘养殖尾水净化效果
constructed wetlandsrecirculating aquaculture systempond aquaculture wastewaterpurification effect
《淡水渔业》 2026 (2)
11-19,9
国家重点研发计划(2023YFD2400501)
评论