全球金矿石标准物质研制及粒金效应研究进展OA
A Review of Research Progress on the Development of Global Gold Ore Reference Materials and the Nugget Effect
标准物质是衡量测试结果准确性的基准,国内外持续研制各类型标准物质以支撑样品测试质量控制、量值溯源和法律仲裁等工作.当前,中国金矿石有证标准物质在种类、定值元素覆盖及低品位段代表性等方面与实际需求存在显著差距,借鉴国际金矿石标准物质研制经验(如类型丰富、定值元素多、低品位段占比高),有助于服务新一轮战略找矿突破.本文基于国内外资源共享平台大数据,系统梳理了全球金矿石标准物质研制现状和关键技术瓶颈.截至 2025年 6月,国外金矿石有证标准物质超 160种,具有类型丰富、定值元素多、低品位段占比高(0.104×10-6~1×10-6 区间占比 40%)等特点,候选物涵盖绿岩、花岗岩、火山岩、变质岩、石英砾岩等多种岩矿石种类,定值元素涵盖Au、Ag、Cu、Mo、Sb、Al等共伴生元素;中国金矿石有证标准物质有 74种,候选物金矿类型主要是石英脉型、蚀变岩型、卡林型 3种,定值元素主要是Au或Au、Ag两个元素,多元素同步定值仅 5种,低品位段占比小(0.2×10-6~1×10-6 区间占比 12%).通过对比,揭示了中国的金矿石标准物质存在类型单一、定值元素局限、低品位覆盖不足等问题.深入分析金矿石加工各环节技术难题,本文指出"粒金效应"是制约标准物质种类丰富度的关键瓶颈,并论证了激光粒度分析法不适用于金矿石加工粒度检查.针对上述差距与挑战,本文建议:加强金矿石加工方法学(特别是针对粒金效应)与专用设备(如大型盘磨机、特种雷蒙磨)研发;系统研制中国典型成矿带系列金矿石标准物质;推行金与共伴生元素同步定值;重点布局边界品位至工业品位区间(尤其是低含量段)标准物质.着力解决因标准物质与实际样品基体差异导致的质控"失控"问题,为全球金矿勘查、选冶、贸易等全产业链提供坚实支撑.
Reference materials serve as the benchmark for evaluating the accuracy of test results.Continuous efforts are being made globally to develop various types of reference materials,supporting quality control in sample testing,metrological traceability,and legal arbitration.Currently,China's certified reference materials(CRMs)for gold ores exhibit significant gaps compared to actual demands,particularly in diversity,coverage of certified elements,and representation of low-grade segments.Drawing on international experience in gold ore CRM development—characterized by rich variety,numerous certified elements,and a high proportion of low-grade materials—can better serve the New Round of Prospecting Breakthrough Strategic Action.Leveraging big data from domestic and international resource-sharing platforms,the current status and key technical bottlenecks in gold ore CRM development globally is systematically reviewed in this paper.As of June 2025,over 160 gold ore CRMs are available internationally,exhibiting features such as diverse types,multiple certified elements,and a high proportion of low-grade materials(40%in the 0.104-1 µg/g range).Candidate materials encompass various rock and ore types,including greenstone,granite,volcanic rock,metamorphic rock,and quartz conglomerate.Certified elements include Au,Ag,Cu,Mo,Sb,Al,and other associated elements.In contrast,China has developed 74 gold ore CRMs.The candidate materials are primarily limited to three gold deposit types:quartz-vein type,altered-rock type,and Carlin type.Certified elements are mainly Au alone or Au-Ag pairs,with only 5 CRMs featuring multi-element certification.The proportion of low-grade materials is small(only 12%in the 0.2-1 µg/g range).This comparison reveals domestic shortcomings,including limited ore-type diversity,narrow elemental certification scope,and insufficient coverage of low-grade segments.Through in-depth analysis of technical challenges across gold ore processing stages,the"nugget effect"is identified as a critical bottleneck constraining the diversity of CRM types and the inapplicability of laser diffraction particle size analysis for checking the grind size of gold ores is demonstrated.To address these gaps and challenges,the following initiatives are proposed:enhance research on gold ore processing methodologies(especially targeting the nugget effect)and develop specialized equipment(e.g.,large disc mills,specialized Raymond mills);systematically develop a series of CRMs for gold ores from China's typical metallogenic belts;implement simultaneous certification of gold and associated elements;and prioritize the development of CRMs covering the boundary grade to industrial grade range,particularly the low-concentration segment.These measures aim to resolve the issue of quality control"loss of control"caused by matrix differences between reference materials and actual samples,thereby supporting the global gold industry chain in exploration,mineral processing,metallurgy,and trade.The BRIEF REPORT is available for this paper at http://www.ykcs.ac.cn/en/article/doi/10.15898/j.ykcs.202503210053.
刘玖芬;李子奇;孙嘉潞;石环宇;刘淑亮;杨理勤;熊英;李志慧;刘佳;赵晓峰;王莹;邢莉圆;王斐然
自然资源要素耦合过程与效应重点实验室,北京 100055||中国地质调查局自然资源综合调查指挥中心,北京 100055||中国地质调查局元素形态与新污染物技术创新中心,云南 昆明 650111中国地质大学(北京)地球科学与资源学院,北京 100083中国地质大学(北京)数理学院,北京 100083中国地质大学(武汉)地球科学学院,湖北 武汉 430074自然资源要素耦合过程与效应重点实验室,北京 100055||中国地质调查局元素形态与新污染物技术创新中心,云南 昆明 650111||中国地质调查局烟台海岸带地质调查中心,山东 烟台 264000廊坊市军队离休退休干部二所,河北 廊坊 065000陕西省地质矿产实验研究所有限公司,陕西 西安 710054河北省区域地质调查院,河北 廊坊 065000中国地质大学(武汉)地质微生物与环境全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430074自然资源要素耦合过程与效应重点实验室,北京 100055||中国地质调查局自然资源综合调查指挥中心,北京 100055自然资源要素耦合过程与效应重点实验室,北京 100055||中国地质调查局自然资源综合调查指挥中心,北京 100055自然资源要素耦合过程与效应重点实验室,北京 100055||中国地质调查局自然资源综合调查指挥中心,北京 100055自然资源要素耦合过程与效应重点实验室,北京 100055||中国地质调查局自然资源综合调查指挥中心,北京 100055
天文与地球科学
金矿石标准物质均匀性粒金效应多元素定值
gold orereference materialsuniformitynugget effectcertified values of multiple elements
《岩矿测试》 2026 (2)
265-281,17
中国地质调查局地质调查项目(DD202502091,DD20250209101,DD20240206308)自然资源部重点实验室开放基金项目(KFKT202420)
评论