首页|期刊导航|护理研究|基于贝叶斯中断时间序列的抗菌药物管理措施效果评价

基于贝叶斯中断时间序列的抗菌药物管理措施效果评价OA

Evaluation on the effect of antimicrobial stewardship measures based on Bayesian interrupted time series

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:探究抗菌药物管理措施实施前后医院感染发生率的动态变化特征,量化评价抗菌药物管理措施的长短期影响.方法:收集2017年7月—2018年12月的住院病人肺炎克雷伯菌(KPN)感染率数据作为干预前数据,2019年1月—2020年6月的住院病人KPN感染率数据作为干预后数据,利用贝叶斯中断时间序列方法评价抗菌药物管理措施干预前后KPN感染率变化趋势.结果:2017年7月—2020年6月平均月感染率为0.941%,抗菌药物管理措施干预前KPN平均月感染率为0.947%,抗菌药物管理措施干预后KPN平均月感染率为0.934%.滞后期为2个月的模型参数估计结果显示,(β)2 有统计学意义(P<0.05),风险比为0.818;(β)3 有统计学意义(P<0.05),(β)1+(β)3=0.021,风险比为1.021;(β)4 有统计学意义(P<0.05),风险比为1.661.干预后模型预测值与反事实值相对变化结果显示,2019年3月—5月的变化均下降(均P<0.05),2020年4月—6月变化均升高(均P<0.05).结论:贝叶斯中断时间序列模型能够有效评价干预措施的长短期效果,也可以评估干预是否具有滞后效应.医院抗菌药物管理措施的实施可以在短期内降低感染风险,干预效果存在2个月的滞后期,长期效果不理想.

Objective:To explore the dynamic change characteristics of the incidence of hospital infections before and after the intervention of antimicrobial stewardship measures,and to quantitatively evaluate the short-term and long-term impacts of antimicrobial stewardship measures.Methods:Data on the infection rate of Klebsiella pneumoniae(KPN)among inpatients from July 2017 to December 2018 were collected as pre-intervention data.Data on the KPN infection rate among inpatients from January 2019 to June 2020 were collected as post-intervention data.The Bayesian interrupted time series method was used to evaluate the changing trend of KPN infection rate before and after the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship measures.Results:The average monthly KPN infection rate from July 2017 to June 2020 was 0.941%.The average monthly KPN infection rate before the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship measures was 0.947%.The average monthly KPN infection rate after the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship measures was 0.934%.The parameter estimation results of the model with a lag period of 2 months showed that(β)2 was statistically significant(P<0.05),with a risk ratio of 0.818.(β)3 was statistically significant(P<0.05),(β)1+(β)3=0.021,with a risk ratio of 1.021.(β)4 was statistically significant(P<0.05),with a risk ratio of 1.661.The results of the relative changes between the predictive values and counterfactual values showed that the changes from March to May 2019 all decreased(all P<0.05),while the changes from April to June 2020 all increased(all P<0.05).Conclusions:The Bayesian interrupted time series model could effectively evaluate the short-term and long-term effects of intervention measures.It could also evaluate whether the intervention had a lag effect or not.The implementation of hospital antimicrobial stewardship measures could reduce the infection risk in the short term,with a 2-month lag period in the intervention effect,while the long-term effect was not ideal.

郝梓欣;任浩;张雨东;吴诒家;鲁祎;段金菊;仇丽霞

山西医科大学,山西 030001山西医科大学,山西 030001山西医科大学,山西 030001山西医科大学,山西 030001山西医科大学,山西 030001山西医科大学第二医院山西医科大学,山西 030001

抗菌药物管理贝叶斯中断时间序列模型医院感染预防控制肺炎克雷伯菌

antimicrobial stewardshipBayesian interrupted time series modelhospital infectionprevention and controlKlebsiella pneumoniae

《护理研究》 2026 (6)

930-934,5

国家自然科学基金资助项目,编号:81973155

10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2026.06.006

评论