国际农药残留评估方法替代争议及对中国的启示OA
Competition Between Traditional and Emerging Methods for International Pesticide Residue Assessment and Its Implications for China
国际农药残留限量标准对保障全球食品贸易与公共健康安全至关重要,其制修订必须依据全球公认的膳食风险评估方法.2025年9月召开的国际食品法典农药残留委员会第56届年会,重点审议了"全球慢性膳食暴露估计值"方法替代"国际估算每日摄入量"方法议题,因存在较大分歧,最终会议作出暂缓实施的决定.本文基于中国代表团视角,分析了两种膳食风险评估方法的技术特征、争议焦点,为我国深入参与国际规则,提升农残风险管理能力提供参考.
Codex Alimentarius standards on Pesticide Residue are critical for safeguarding global food trade and public health security.Their formulation and revision must rely on globally recognized dietary risk assessment methods.At the 56th Session of the Codex Committee on Pesticide Residues(CCPR),held in September 2025,the Committee focused on deliberations concerning the proposed replacement of the International Estimated Daily Intake(IEDI)methodology with the Global Estimate of Chronic Dietary Exposure(GECDE)approach.Owing to substantial divergences among member states,the meeting ultimately decided to postpone the implementation of the new method.From the perspective of the Chinese delegation,this paper analyzes the technical characteristics and controversial focuses of the two dietary risk assessment methods,aiming to provide references for China's deeper participation in international rule-making and for improving its capacity in pesticide residue risk management.
李贤宾;陶传江
农业农村部农药检定所,北京 100125农业农村部农药检定所,北京 100125
农业科技
膳食暴露评估农药残留全球慢性膳食暴露估计值国际估算每日摄入量风险评估
dietary exposure assessmentpesticide residuesGECDEIEDIrisk assessment
《农药科学与管理》 2026 (3)
5-8,4
本文为"国家农药残留标准高质量发展与科普行动"系列成果.
评论