首页|期刊导航|流体机械|前置螺旋管段对弯头冲蚀磨损的影响

前置螺旋管段对弯头冲蚀磨损的影响OA

Influence of the preceding spiral pipe section on erosion wear of elbows

中文摘要英文摘要

针对解决气固两相流普通弯头冲蚀严重的问题,设计了一种前置螺旋管段弯头.利用Fluent软件对螺旋管段的扭转角度、安装距离以及中间螺旋管段长度进行了抗冲蚀结构优化,得到了最优抗冲蚀性能的前置螺旋管段弯头,并验证了该最优结构在不同介质流速、质量流量及时间因素下是否仍具备抗冲蚀效果.结果显示,前置螺旋管段弯头仅在扭转角度为90°~600°时具有抗冲蚀效果,其中扭转角度为210°~420°时,其抗冲蚀效果较普通弯头平均提高34.13%;当扭转角度为390°,300°和330°时,前置螺旋管段弯头的最大冲蚀速率在所研究的安装距离和中间螺旋管段长度范围内均低于普通弯头;尤其在安装距离为0 mm、中间螺旋管段长度为200~400 mm时,抗冲蚀效果较为显著.经优化得到的最优结构参数为:螺旋管段扭转角度390°、安装距离0 mm、中间螺旋管段长度300 mm,此时前置螺旋管段弯头的抗冲蚀效果最佳,较普通弯头提高47.32%.此外,尽管该弯头与普通弯头的最大冲蚀速率均随介质流速、质量流量和时间的增加而增大,但该弯头的最大冲蚀速率始终低于普通弯头,表明其始终保持抗冲蚀效果.研究结果可为弯头的抗冲蚀结构设计提供参考.

To address the severe erosion issue in common elbows for gas-solid two-phase flow,a pre-helical pipe elbow was designed.The anti-erosion structure of the helical pipe section was optimized using Fluent software in terms of twist angle,installation distance,and intermediate helical pipe section length,resulting in a pre-helical pipe elbow with optimal anti-erosion performance.The anti-erosion effectiveness of this optimized structure was verified under varying medium flow velocities,mass flow rates,and time factors.The results show that the pre-helical pipe elbow exhibits anti-erosion effects only when the twist angle is between 90° and 600°,with an average improvement of 34.13%compared to the common elbow when the twist angle ranges from 210° to 420°.At twist angles of 390°,300°,and 330°,the maximum erosion rates of the pre-helical pipe elbow are lower than those of the common elbow across the studied installation distances and intermediate helical pipe section lengths.Particularly when the installation distance is 0 mm and the intermediate helical pipe section length is 200~400 mm,the anti-erosion effect is more significant.The optimized structural parameters are as follows:helical pipe section twist angle of 390°,installation distance of 0 mm,and intermediate helical pipe section length of 300 mm.Under these conditions,the pre-helical pipe elbow achieves the best anti-erosion performance,improving by 47.32%compared to the common elbow.Furthermore,although the maximum erosion rates of both this elbow and the common elbow increase with medium flow velocity,mass flow rate,and time,the maximum erosion rate of this elbow consistently remains lower than that of the common elbow,indicating that it maintains its anti-erosion effectiveness at all times.The research results can provide a reference for the anti-erosion structural design of elbows.

谢光明;闫冲冲;黄天成;华剑;李慧;袁新梅

长江大学 机械工程学院,湖北 荆州 434023长江大学 机械工程学院,湖北 荆州 434023||慎江阀门有限公司,浙江乐清 325605长江大学 机械工程学院,湖北 荆州 434023长江大学 机械工程学院,湖北 荆州 434023慎江阀门有限公司,浙江乐清 325605长江大学 机械工程学院,湖北 荆州 434023

机械制造

气固两相流冲蚀数值模拟结构优化

gas-solid two-phase flowerosionnumerical simulationstructural optimization

《流体机械》 2026 (1)

74-83,10

国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05038-001-LH002)

10.3969/j.issn.1005-0329.2026.01.010

评论