科研项目评审风险及防控对策OA

The evaluation of scientific and technological projects is the core link of scientific research project management,while risk assessment in project evaluation is crucial for prevention and control.Especially under the background of deepening reform of scientific and technological evaluation and promoting the policies to streamline administration and delegate power,improve regulation,and upgrade services,risk governance has become a core issue in both academic realm and government administrative departments.However,existing systematic research on risk classification governance based on the entire process of scientific research project evaluation is relatively insufficient,and lacks quantitative validation.Chongqing,a pivotal hub for scientific and technological innovation in western China,has made notable strides in recent years through innovative approaches to municipal-level research project evaluations,and its efforts have not only bolstered regional innovation but also propelled industrial upgrading.In view of this,based on the years of practical experience in Chongqing scientific research project management,combining the theories of risk identification and governance in scientific research project evaluation and the questionnaire survey method,this paper systematically identifies and categorizes two major types of review risks:gross integrity and quality.Among them,the risk points of integrity mainly include the confidentiality system,anonymity,interest association,and information system security;the quality risk points mainly include four aspects of review methods,project grouping,review criteria,and expert supervision.Furthermore,in response to the two major categories of risks identified in the evaluation of scientific and technological projects,specific measures and recommendations are proposed including supervision of critical processes,establishment of restraint mechanisms,digital technology empowerment,and development of a multidimensional prevention and control system encompassing'standards-mechanisms-personnel-technology'.It aims to enhance the standardization and quality efficiency of scientific research project evaluation,and ensure the justice and credibility of scientific research project management.