公共研发与私人转化:职务科技成果赋权改革的制度逻辑与规范边界OA
Public R&D and Private Commercialization:The Institutional Logic and Normative Boundaries of Empowerment Reform for Job-Related Scientific and Technological Achievements
职务科技成果赋权改革是中国政府主导公共研发经由私人转化的重要制度性探索或实践,本质上是对知识产权归属的重新拨归或配置.基于科技成果转化机制的市场化改革导向,以及摆脱科技成果行政管理惯性和传统的束缚,尤其是顺应所有权与知识产权分立的客观现实,中国职务科技成果赋权改革应回归到以知识产权为基本民事权利的框架下进行.然而,不同于私人研发下的知识产权旨在事前激励创新,将公共研发下的知识产权赋予私人旨在事后激励转化.囿于完全排他性的知识产权并非职务科技成果转化的必要条件,中国应以非排他性作为知识产权许可的基本原则,并对那些因具有显著公共重要性以至于非排他性许可也不必要的公共研发实施版权开放许可式知识产权许可,以便最大限度地实现公共研发经由私人转化提升社会整体福利的改革目标.
The reform of empowerment concerning job-related scientific and technological achievement is an important institutional exploration or practice led by China to facilitate the private commercialization of public R&D,which primarily entails the reallocation or redistribution of intellectual property.Guided by the market-oriented reform of the mechanism for commercializing scientific and technological achievements,and aiming to break free from the inertia and constraints of traditional administrative management of such achievements,particularly in alignment with the objective reality of the separation between ownership and intellectual property rights,the reform on empowering researchers with rights of job-related scientific and technological achievements should return to a framework that treats intellectual property as a fundamental civil right.However,unlike intellectual property rights in privately funded R&D,which are designed to incentivize innovation ex ante,granting private parties intellectual property rights arising from publicly funded R&D aims to incentivize commercialization ex post.Given that fully exclusive intellectual property rights are not a necessary condition for the commercialization of job-related scientific and technological achievements,China should adopt non-exclusivity as the fundamental principle for intellectual property licensing.Furthermore,for publicly funded research whose outcomes possess such significant public importance that even non-exclusive licensing is unnecessary,China should implement open copyright licensing of intellectual property.This would maximize the reform objective of enhancing overall social welfare by enabling privately commercializing of publicly funded research.
李仲平
广东金融学院法学院,广东 广州 510521
社会科学
职务科技成果公共研发私人转化版权开放许可
job-related scientific and technological achievementspublic R&Dprivate commercializationopen copyright license
《科技创新发展战略研究》 2026 (1)
3-14,12
国家社会科学基金一般项目"CPTPP国有企业补贴规则与中国国有知识产权归属改革研究"(22BFX096)
评论