心电图MVP评分在高血压并发心房颤动中的预测价值OA
Predictive value of electrocardiogram MVP score in hypertension complicated by atrial fibrillation
目的 探讨心电图形态-电压-P 波持续时间(morphology-voltage-P-wave duration,MVP)评分在高血压并发心房颤动(简称房颤)中的预测价值.方法 选取 198 例高血压住院患者,根据是否并发阵发性房颤分为房颤组(n=99)和单纯高血压组(n=99).比较两组左心房内径(LAD)、左心室舒张末内径(LVEDD)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、P波时限、Ⅰ导联P 波电压、MVP 评分、PtfV1、RV5 及 RV5+SV1 等指标,采用 ROC 曲线分析 MVP 评分的预测效能.结果 房颤组LAD明显大于单纯高血压组(P<0.001),而两组LVEDD、LVEF差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);房颤组P波时限、PtfV1 阳性率、RV5、RV5+SV1、MVP 评分均明显大于单纯高血压组,而Ⅰ导联P 波电压明显低于单纯高血压组(P<0.05);MVP 评分≥4 分预测房颤的ROC曲线下面积为0.818,敏感性为0.838,特异性为 0.798.结论 MVP 评分是高血压患者并发房颤的独立预测因子.
Objective To investigate the predictive value of electrocardiogram morphology-voltage-P-wave duration(MVP)score in hypertension complicated by atrial fibrillation(AF).Methods A total of 198 hospitalized patients with hypertension were enrolled,and divided into an AF group(n=99)and a hypertension-only group(n=99)based on the presence of paroxysmal AF.Indicators such as left atrial diameter(LAD),left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD),LVEF,P-wave duration,P-wave voltage in lead Ⅰ,MVP score,PtfV1,RV5,and RV5+SV1 were compared between the two groups.The predictive efficacy of MVP score was analyzed using ROC curve analysis.Results The LAD in the AF group was significantly larger than that in the hypertension-only group(P<0.001),while there were no statistically significant differences in LVEDD or LVEF between the two groups(both P>0.05).P-wave duration,positive rate of PtfV1,RV5,RV5+SV1,and MVP score were all significantly higher in the AF group,whereas the P-wave voltage in lead Ⅰ was significantly lower compared with the hypertension-only group(P<0.05).The area under the ROC curve for an MVP score≥4 points in predicting AF was 0.818,with a sensitivity of 0.838 and a specificity of 0.798.Conclusion The MVP score is an independent predictor of AF in patients with hypertension.
翁炎琴;王新康
350001 福建 福州,福建省立医院心电诊断科,福建医科大学省立临床医学院350001 福建 福州,福建省立医院心电诊断科,福建医科大学省立临床医学院
医药卫生
高血压心房颤动心电图MVP评分预测价值
hypertensionatrial fibrillationelectrocardiogram MVP scorepredictive value
《实用心电与临床诊疗》 2026 (1)
41-44,50,5
评论