首页|期刊导航|腹腔镜外科杂志|肿瘤近侧肠管精准切除在新辅助治疗后腹腔镜直肠前切除术中的应用

肿瘤近侧肠管精准切除在新辅助治疗后腹腔镜直肠前切除术中的应用OA

Application of precise proximal intestinal tract resection in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:通过与常规近侧扩大切除进行对照,探讨基于超声内镜下肠管状态评估及定位的精准近侧切除术在新辅助治疗后腹腔镜直肠前切除术中应用的安全性与临床获益.方法:回顾分析2021 年1 月至2024 年6 月新辅助治疗后接受腹腔镜直肠前切除术的95 例直肠癌患者的临床资料,其中45 例行肿瘤近侧扩大切除术(扩大组);50 例术前行超声肠镜检查,评估肿瘤退缩情况及肿瘤近端肠壁厚度,于肠壁厚度明显分界处以纳米炭混悬液标记,作为肠管切除的最低位置,纳入肿瘤近侧精准切除组(精准组).超声肠镜由经验丰富的内镜医生完成,手术均由同一团队完成,行标准的腹腔镜直肠前切除术.对比分析两组患者基本资料、术中、病理及术后恢复情况.结果:精准组游离脾曲比例低于扩大组(28%vs.100%,P<0.001),手术时间[(253.88±58.51)min vs.(276.33±32.21)min,P=0.025]、近侧肠管切除长度[(11.28±2.59)cm vs.(15.88±3.50)cm,P<0.001)]短于扩大组.两组淋巴结清扫数量、出血量、术后病理分期差异无统计学意义.吻合口漏发生率差异亦无统计学意义(6.0%vs.6.7%,P>0.999).患者均于术后6 个月内完成造口还纳手术,未发生吻合口分离及影响造口还纳手术的吻合口近端肠管管状狭窄等并发症.结论:基于超声内镜下的精准近侧切除术可精准定位、切除放疗后肿瘤近端水肿的肠管,与常规近端扩大切除相比,可降低游离脾曲的比例,缩短手术时间,吻合口相关并发症发生率相当,值得临床推广.

Objective:To compare with conventional extended proximal resection and investigate the safety and clinical benefits of precise proximal resection based on endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)status assessment and localization of intestinal tract in laparo-scopic anterior rectal resection after neoadjuvant therapy.Methods:Clinical data of 95 patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior re-section following neoadjuvant therapy between Jan.2021 and Jun.2024 were retrospectively analyzed.Among them,45 patients received conventional extended proximal resection(extended group),and 50 patients underwent preoperative EUS to evaluate the tumor regres-sion and the proximal intestinal wall thickness of the tumor.The obvious boundary of intestinal wall thickness was marked with carbon nanoparticle suspension as the lowest position for intestinal tract resection(precise group).All EUS examinations were performed by experienced endoscopists,and all operations were conducted by the same surgical team with standard laparoscopic anterior rectal resec-tion.Baseline characteristics,intraoperative parameters,pathological findings,and postoperative recovery were compared between the two groups.Results:The proportion of splenic flexure mobilization in the precise group was significantly lower than that in the extended group(28%vs.100%,P<0.001).The operative time[(253.88±58.51)min vs.(276.33±32.21)min,P=0.025]and the length of proximal intestinal tract resection[(11.28±2.59)cm vs.(15.88±3.50)cm,P<0.001]in the precise group were shorter than those in the extended group.No significant differences were found in the number of harvested lymph nodes,intraoperative blood loss and postoperative pathological stage.The incidence of anastomotic leakage was comparable(6.0%vs.6.7%,P>0.999).All patients with a defunctioning stoma underwent stoma reversal within 6 months after surgery,and no complications such as anastomotic disruption and tubular stenosis of the proximal intestinal tract at the anastomasis that affected stoma reversal occurred.Conclusions:EUS-guided preci-sion proximal resection allows accurate localization and excision of irradiation-induced edematous bowel proximal to the tumor.Compared with conventional extended proximal resection,it reduces the need for splenic flexure mobilization and shortens operative time,while maintaining comparable anastomosis-related complications.This technique is worthy of clinical promotion.

沈帅;夏文龙;孙军席;刘铁

潍坊市人民医院结直肠肛门外科,山东 潍坊,261041潍坊市人民医院结直肠肛门外科,山东 潍坊,261041潍坊市人民医院结直肠肛门外科,山东 潍坊,261041潍坊市人民医院结直肠肛门外科,山东 潍坊,261041

医药卫生

直肠肿瘤直肠前切除术腹腔镜检查超声内镜新辅助治疗精准切除

Rectal neoplasmsAnterior resection of the rectumLaparoscopyEndoscopic ultrasoundNeoadjuvant therapyPrecise resection

《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2026 (1)

63-68,6

潍坊市卫生健康委科研项目计划(WFWSJK-2023-135)

10.13499/j.cnki.fqjwkzz.2026.01.063

评论