何种数字创新生态驱动新质生产力发展OA
Which Digital Innovation Ecosystem Drives the Development of New Quality Productive Forces?—A Dynamic QCA Analysis Based on Provincial Panel Data
基于数字创新生态系统理论,结合组态视角构建研究框架,以2017-2022年中国31个省(区、市)的面板数据为研究样本,运用动态QCA方法,从时间维度和空间维度检验数字创新生态系统要素驱动新质生产力发展的组态路径.研究发现:①在时间维度上,单个数字创新生态系统要素不构成新质生产力发展的必要条件,但数据要素与数字治理的必要性逐年上升,呈现出明显的时间效应;在空间维度上,不同变量构成部分地区高水平新质生产力发展的必要条件,且呈现显著的地区差异.②驱动高水平新质生产力发展的组态路径有5条,可归纳为"要素—治理"赋能驱动型、主体引领内生驱动型、系统协同共生驱动型等3种模式;导致低水平新质生产力发展的组态路径有7条,可归纳为环境生态缺位型、内生动力匮乏型、结构失衡限制型等3种模式.③所有组态在整体上并未表现出明显的时间效应与地区效应.从时间维度来看,各组态均在样本考察期内具有较强的稳定性,但新质生产力的驱动模式逐步向系统协同共生驱动型转变,且数字创新生态系统中主体、资源与环境多要素的联动效应日益凸显.
As an advanced productivity form led by innovation,new quality productive forces serve as the core engine for promoting high-quality development.In the digital economy era,the digital innovation ecosystem provides critical support for the cultivation and release of these forces by integrating innovation subjects,resources,and environments.Based on digital in-novation ecosystem theory,this study employs the dynamic QCA method and uses panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2017 to 2022 as a sample to systematically explore the multi-configuration paths and spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of digital innovation ecosystem elements driving the development of new quality productive forces.The research aims to identify configurations that effectively drive this development and examine whether these paths exhibit significant temporal and regional effects.The findings indicate that:①From a temporal dimen-sion,no single digital innovation ecosystem element constitutes a necessary condition for the de-velopment of new quality productive forces,though the necessity of data elements and digital governance shows an upward trend annually,reflecting a significant temporal effect.From a spa-tial dimension,the eastern region exhibits a high dependence on innovation subjects,resources,and environments;the central region focuses on subjects and resources;and the western region shows lower dependence,indicating distinct regional effects.②Five configuration paths gener-ate high-level new quality productive forces,categorized into three modes:"Element-Governance"empowerment-driven,Subject-led endogenous-driven,and System synergy symbiotic-driven.Conversely,seven configuration paths lead to low-level development,summa-rized as Environmental ecological absence,Lack of endogenous power,and Structural imbalance limitation.③While the configuration paths did not show significant temporal or regional effects during the sample period,the overall driving mechanism is shifting toward a system synergy symbiotic-driven mode,indicating that the linkage effect of multiple elements is becoming in-creasingly vital.Theoretically,this study advances the dynamic and empirical expansion of digi-tal innovation ecosystem theory,addresses the call for causality and temporality in configuration research,and deepens the understanding of context-dependency.Practically,it provides a refer-ence for regions to develop new quality productive forces according to local conditions:first,by strengthening the core role of data and digital governance;second,by fostering synergy across multiple elements;and third,by respecting regional differences to develop productivity accord-ing to local contexts.
胡珍
东北大学文法学院,辽宁 沈阳 110169
管理科学
数字创新生态系统新质生产力数字创新主体数字创新资源数字创新环境组态视角动态QCA面板数据
digital innovation ecosystemnew quality productive forcesdigital innovation subjectsdigital innovation resourcesdigital innovation environmentconfiguration perspectivedynamic QCApanel data
《创新科技》 2026 (3)
15-30,16
国家社会科学基金一般项目"中国环境政策组合对生态环境治理水平的影响机制与优化策略研究"(21BZZ062)辽宁省社会科学基金青年项目"数字驱动辽宁省政务服务增值化改革的优化路径研究"(L25CGL039).
评论