首页|期刊导航|兵工自动化|伪攻角三回路自动驾驶仪极点配置策略对比

伪攻角三回路自动驾驶仪极点配置策略对比OA

Comparison of Pole Placement Strategies for Pseudo Angle of Attack Three Loop Autopilot

中文摘要英文摘要

为解决自动驾驶仪设计时,极点选取过分依赖工程经验的问题,提出 3 种极点配置策略.在考虑开环截止频率约束极点配置方法的基础上,进一步推导 3 种不同极点配置策略下自动驾驶仪各参数的解析表达式,并分析每个策略各自的优缺点.通过 2 个不同特性的设计实例,对 3 种策略下的自动驾驶仪响应特性进行对比分析.结果表明:3 种方法均能保证足够的稳定裕度,ITAE法则响应速度最快,但具有超调和一次振荡;实极点为主导极点的准则可以做到阶跃响应无超调;共圆准则下的相角裕度最大.

In order to solve the problem that the selection of poles depends too much on engineering experience in the design of autopilot,three pole-placement strategies are proposed.Based on the pole assignment method considering the open-loop cut-off frequency constraint,the analytical expressions of the autopilot parameters under three different pole assignment strategies are derived,and the advantages and disadvantages of each strategy are analyzed.The autopilot response characteristics under three strategies are compared and analyzed through two design examples with different characteristics.The results show that all the three methods can ensure enough stability margin,and the ITAE rule has the fastest response speed,but it has overshoot and single oscillation.The rule with the real pole as the dominant pole can achieve no overshoot in the step response.The phase angle margin is the largest under the concircular rule.

孔哲;杨若眉;赵红刚

西安航天动力技术研究所,西安 710025西安航天动力技术研究所,西安 710025西安航天动力技术研究所,西安 710025

军事科技

伪攻角反馈三回路自动驾驶仪极点配置

pseudo-angle-of-attack feedbackthree-loop autopilotpole assignment

《兵工自动化》 2026 (3)

64-67,91,5

10.7690/bgzdh.2026.03.011

评论