首页|期刊导航|重庆科技大学学报(社会科学版)|生成式人工智能数据训练合理使用规则的法理逻辑与实现路径

生成式人工智能数据训练合理使用规则的法理逻辑与实现路径OA

The Legal Logic and Implementation Path of the Fair Use Rule for Generative Artificial Intelligence Data Training

中文摘要英文摘要

生成式人工智能数据训练在提升高质量作品供给的同时,也诱发了著作权侵权风险,其中的核心争议在于合理使用规则能否覆盖数据训练对作品的获取和使用过程.基于市场失灵与转换性使用理论的法理释明,以及降低生成式人工智能技术偏见的现实考量,将著作权法中的合理使用规则嵌入生成式人工智能数据训练场景具有可行性与必要性.然而,合理使用规则的适用依然存在权益冲突加剧、主体单一及适用范围泛化等困境.因此,有必要以利益平衡和比例原则为理念指引,将合理使用适用主体拓展至商业主体,承认特定条件下的商业使用;同时,生成式AI数据训练合理使用作品的范围应限于数据输入和模型训练两个阶段,而在行为维度则限于复制行为.

While generative artificial intelligence data training enhances the supply of high-quality works,it also induces risks of copyright infringement.The core controversy lies in whether the fair use rule can cover the process of accessing and utilizing works in data training.Based on the legal interpretation of market failure and transformative use theory,as well as the practical consideration of reducing biases in generative artificial intelligence technology,embedding the fair use rule from copyright law into the scenario of generative artificial intelligence data training is proved to be both feasible and necessary.However,challenges remain in the application of the fair use rule,including heightened conflicts of rights and interests,a narrow range of eligible subjects,and overly broad application scope.Therefore,it is necessary to expand the scope of fair use subjects to include commercial entities under the guidance of the principles of interest balancing and proportionality,recognizing commercial use under specific conditions.Meanwhile,the scope of works used under fair use in generative AI data training should be limited to the two stages of data input and model training,while in terms of behavior,it should be confined to acts of reproduction.

张湘草

河南大学法学院,河南 开封 475000

社会科学

生成式AI数据训练合理使用利益平衡比例原则

generative AIdata trainingfair useinterest balancingproportionality principle

《重庆科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (1)

55-65,11

10.19406/j.issn.2097-4523.2026.01.005

评论