首页|期刊导航|作物杂志|抗旱性藜麦幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应

抗旱性藜麦幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理响应OA

Physiological Response of Quinoa Seedlings with Drought Resistance to Drought Stress

中文摘要英文摘要

为研究抗旱性藜麦幼苗对干旱胁迫的响应,选取强抗旱型藜麦品种陇藜 1 号(LL1)和新育品系LQ18作为试验材料,利用聚乙二醇 6000(PEG-6000)溶液模拟干旱环境,设置正常灌水(CK)、轻度干旱胁迫(5%PEG-6000)和重度干旱胁迫(20%PEG-6000)3 个处理,考察了藜麦种子的发芽率、发芽势和发芽指数,幼苗株高、叶面积和根长,地上及地下部干重,可溶性蛋白和脯氨酸含量,超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和过氧化物酶(POD)活性及丙二醛(MDA)含量.结果表明,重度干旱胁迫降低了 2个品种(系)的株高、叶面积和地上部干重,但提高了根长、地下部干重和根冠比.其中,LQ18 的叶面积和地上部干重降幅,以及根长、地下部干重和根冠比增幅均小于LL1.干旱胁迫下LL1 的可溶性蛋白含量逐渐降低,但LQ18的可溶性蛋白含量先升高后降低直至与CK无显著差异.重度干旱胁迫下2 个品种(系)的脯氨酸含量均显著升高,且LQ18的脯氨酸含量显著高于LL1.干旱胁迫影响了 2个品种(系)的SOD、POD活性并提高了MDA含量,重度干旱胁迫下LQ18的SOD活性略有下降,但其POD活性显著提高,且MDA含量显著低于LL1.

To investigate the response of drought-resistant quinoa seedlings to drought stress,the strongly drought-resistant quinoa variety Longli No.1(LL1)and the new breeding line LQ18 were selected as experimental materials.PEG-6000 solution was used to simulate drought environment.Three treatments were set:normal irrigation(CK),mild drought stress(5%PEG-6000),and severe drought stress(20%PEG-6000).We investigated quinoa seed germination rate,germination potential,germination index;seedling plant height,leaf area,root length,aboveground and underground dry weights;soluble protein and proline contents;superoxide dismutase(SOD)and peroxidase(POD)activities;and malondialdehyde(MDA)content.The results showed that severe drought stress reduced plant height,leaf area,and aboveground dry weight in both varieties(lines),but increased root length,underground dry weight,and root-shoot ratio.Specifically,the reductions in leaf area and aboveground dry weight,as well as the increases in root length,underground dry weight,and root-shoot ratio were all smaller in LQ18 than in LL1.Under drought stress,the soluble protein content of LL1 gradually decreased,while that of LQ18 first increased and then decreased to a level with no significant difference from CK.Under severe drought stress,the proline content of both varieties(lines)significantly increased,and the proline content of LQ18 was significantly higher than that of LL1.Drought stress influenced the activities of SOD and POD and increased MDA content in both varieties(lines).Under severe stress,the SOD activity of LQ18 decreased slightly,whereas its POD activity increased significantly;furthermore,its MDA content remained significantly lower than that of LL1.

高艳梅;冯鹏睿;陈薇薇;张萌;张永清

山西师范大学生命科学学院,030031,山西太原山西师范大学生命科学学院,030031,山西太原山西师范大学生命科学学院,030031,山西太原山西师范大学生命科学学院,030031,山西太原山西师范大学生命科学学院,030031,山西太原||山西师范大学地理科学学院,030031,山西太原

藜麦干旱胁迫种子萌发幼苗生长生理特性

QuinoaDrought stressSeed germinationSeedling growthPhysiological characteristics

《作物杂志》 2026 (1)

182-188,7

山西省基础研究计划(202303021212154)山西省回国留学人员科研资助项目(2023-111)山西省高等学校科技创新项目(2022L259)

10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2026.01.023

评论