首页|期刊导航|浙江医学|白蛋白校正阴离子间隙对ICU重度烧伤患者预后的预测价值

白蛋白校正阴离子间隙对ICU重度烧伤患者预后的预测价值OA

Prognostic value of albumin-corrected anion gap in patients with severe burns in the ICU

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨白蛋白校正阴离子间隙(ACAG)对重症监护病房(ICU)重度烧伤患者预后的预测价值.方法 本研究为单中心回顾性队列研究,纳入2011年7月至2024年7月大庆油田总医院ICU收治的71例重度烧伤患者.根据患者在ICU内的死亡情况,分为生存组47例和死亡组24例.收集患者入院后24 h内临床资料,包括人口学特征、疾病严重程度评分、实验室指标及ACAG值.采用ROC曲线评估ACAG对ICU重度烧伤患者病死的预测效能,并依据约登指数确定ACAG的最佳截断值,根据最佳截断值将患者分为低ACAG组和高ACAG组.采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线比较高ACAG组和低ACAG组ICU生存率.采用多因素Cox回归分析影响ICU重度烧伤患者病死的因素.采用限制性立方样条(RCS)分析ACAG水平与ICU重度烧伤患者病死率的独立关联关系.结果 死亡组患者急性生理学和慢性健康状况评价Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、阴离子间隙(AG)、ACAG均高于存活组(均P<0.05).ROC曲线分析显示,ACAG预测ICU重度烧伤患者病死的AUC高于AG、APACHE Ⅱ评分和SOFA评分(0.858比0.753、0.791和0.804,均P<0.01),其最佳截断值为16.99 mmol/L,对应的灵敏度为0.857,特异度为0.796.Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析显示,高ACAG组患者累积生存率为53.3%,低于低ACAG组的78.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).多因素Cox回归分析显示,高ACAG水平是ICU重度烧伤患者病死的独立危险因素(P<0.01).RCS分析显示,ACAG水平与ICU重度烧伤患者病死率存在独立的连续正向关联(HR=1.181,95%CI:1.102~1.273,P<0.001).结论 ACAG是ICU重度烧伤患者预后的独立预测指标,其预测效能优于传统评分系统,可作为评估患者死亡风险的重要工具.

Objective To investigate the predictive value of albumin-corrected anion gap(ACAG)in predicting outcomes of patients with severe burns in the intensive care unit(ICU).Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study included 71 patients with severe burns admitted to the ICU of Daqing Oilfield General Hospital from July 2011 to July 2024.The patients were divided into a survival group(47 cases)and a death group(24 cases)based on their mortality status in the ICU.Clinical data within 24 hours of admission were collected,including demographic characteristics,disease severity scores,laboratory indicators,and ACAG values.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive efficacy of ACAG for mortality in ICU patients with severe burns.The optimal cut-off value of ACAG was determined based on the Youden index,and patients were divided into low-ACAG and high-ACAG groups accordingly.Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to compare ICU survival rates between the high-ACAG and low-ACAG groups.Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors influencing mortality of ICU patients with severe burns.Restricted cubic spline(RCS)analysis was used to examine the independent association between ACAG and mortality of ICU patients with severe burns.Results Compared with the survivor group,the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ(APACHE Ⅱ)score,Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA)score,anion gap(AG),and ACAG in the death group were significantly higher(all P<0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that ACAG had a higher area under the curve(AUC)for predicting mortality of ICU patients with severe burns than AG,APACHE Ⅱ score,and SOFA score(0.858 vs.0.753,0.791,and 0.804,respectively;all P<0.01).The optimal cut-off value for ACAG was 16.99 mmol/L,with a sensitivity of 0.857 and a specificity of 0.796.Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis indicated that the cumulative survival rate in the high-ACAG group was 53.3%,which was significantly lower than that in the low-ACAG group(78.0%,P<0.01).Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that high ACAG level was an independent risk factor for mortality of ICU patients with severe burns(P<0.01).RCS analysis demonstrated an independent and continuous positive association between ACAG and ICU mortality(HR=1.181,95%CI:1.102-1.273,P<0.001).Conclusion ACAG is an independent predictor of prognosis in the ICU patients with severe burns,with superior predictive performance compared with traditional scoring systems.It may serve as an important tool for assessing mortality risk in patients.

金鑫;苏善道

163100 大庆油田总医院重症医学科163100 大庆油田总医院重症医学科

白蛋白校正阴离子间隙重度烧伤重症监护病房预后

Albumin-corrected anion gapSevere burnsIntensive care unitPrognosis

《浙江医学》 2026 (2)

162-166,172,6

大庆市指导性科技计划项目(zdy-2024-63)

10.12056/j.issn.1006-2785.2026.48.2.2025-1297

评论