首页|期刊导航|中国药房|ICIs一线治疗晚期胃癌有效性及安全性的网状Meta分析

ICIs一线治疗晚期胃癌有效性及安全性的网状Meta分析OA

Network meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 评价免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)一线治疗晚期胃癌的有效性及安全性.方法 检索PubMed、Web of Science、Em-base、The Cochrane Library、万方数据、中国知网、维普网,收集ICIs一线治疗晚期胃癌的Ⅲ期临床随机对照试验(RCT)及相关肿瘤学术年会的会议摘要,检索时限为建库起至2025年6月1日.筛选文献、提取数据、评价文献质量后,采用R语言软件4.3.2版进行网状Meta分析.结果 共纳入8项研究,共计7 801例患者.网状Meta分析结果显示,在有效性方面,与化疗(Chemo)比较,SHR-1701_Chemo、卡度尼利单抗+化疗(Cadoni_Chemo)、信迪利单抗+化疗、帕博利珠单抗+化疗和替雷利珠单抗+化疗均能显著延长患者的中位总生存期(OS)和中位无进展生存期(PFS)(P<0.05);而纳武利尤单抗+化疗仅显著延长了患者的中位PFS(P<0.05).累积排名曲线下面积(SUCRA)结果显示,中位OS排名前2位的干预措施为SHR-1701_Chemo和Cadoni_Chemo;中位PFS排名前2位的干预措施为Cadoni_Chemo和SHR-1701_Chemo.对于程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)综合阳性评分(CPS)≥5分患者,Cadoni_Chemo和SHR-1701_Chemo同样展现出最优的OS和PFS获益(P<0.05).在安全性方面,各干预措施的任意不良事件(AEs)发生率及≥3级AEs发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).任意AEs发生率SUCRA排名前2位的为SHR-1701_Chemo和Chemo;≥3级AEs发生率SUCRA排名前2位的为Chemo和舒格利单抗+化疗.结论 对于晚期胃癌患者,Cadoni_Chemo和SHR-1701_Chemo展现出最佳的OS和PFS获益,且在PD-L1 CPS≥5分的患者中优势依然明确;在安全性方面,Chemo引起的任意AEs及≥3级AEs的发生风险相对较低.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer.METHODS PubMed,Web of Science,Embase,The Cochrane Library,Wanfang Data,CNKI,and VIP databases were searched to collect phase Ⅲ clinical randomized controlled trials(RCTs)on ICIs as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer,as well as abstracts from relevant oncology academic conferences.The search period spanned from database inception to June 1,2025.After screening literature,extracting data,and assessing quality,a network meta-analysis was performed using R software version 4.3.2.RESULTS A total of 8 studies involving 7 801 patients were included.Network meta-analysis results showed that,in terms of efficacy,compared with chemotherapy(Chemo),SHR-1701_Chemo,Cadonilimab_Chemo,Sintilimab_Chemo,Pembrolizumab_Chemo,and Tislelizumab_Chemo significantly prolonged median overall survival(OS)and median progression free survival(PFS)in patients(P<0.05);whereas Nivolumab_Chemo only significantly improved median PFS(P<0.05).Surface under the cumulative ranking curve(SUCRA)results indicated that the top 2 interventions for median OS were SHR-1701_Chemo and Cadonilimab_Chemo;for PFS,the top 2 were Cadonilimab_Chemo and SHR-1701_Chemo.For patients with combined positive score(CPS)≥5 points for programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1),Cadonilimab_Chemo and SHR-1701_Chemo also demonstrated the optimal OS and PFS benefits(P<0.05).Regarding safety,there were no statistically significant differences among the interventions in the incidence of any adverse events(AEs)or grade≥3 AEs(P>0.05).The SUCRA ranking for the incidence of any AEs showed the top 2 were SHR-1701_Chemo and Chemo;for grade≥3 AEs,the top 2 were Chemo and Sugemalimab_Chemo.CONCLUSIONS For patients with advanced gastric cancer,Cadonilimab_Chemo and SHR-1701_Chemo demonstrate the best benefits in terms of OS and PFS,with their advantages remaining clear in patients with PD-L1 CPS≥5 points.In terms of safety,the risk of developing any AEs and grade≥3 AEs is relatively lowest with Chemo.

柯力援;王艳;王安平;黄丹雪

大连理工大学附属肿瘤医院/辽宁省肿瘤医院药学部,沈阳 110042大连理工大学附属肿瘤医院/辽宁省肿瘤医院药学部,沈阳 110042沈阳药科大学生命科学与生物制药学院,沈阳 110016大连理工大学附属肿瘤医院/辽宁省肿瘤医院药学部,沈阳 110042

医药卫生

免疫检查点抑制剂晚期胃癌程序性细胞死亡蛋白1程序性死亡受体配体1免疫双抗治疗

immune checkpoint inhibitorsadvanced gastric cancerprogrammed cell death protein-1programmed cell death ligand-1dual immune-blockade therapy

《中国药房》 2026 (3)

383-388,6

辽宁省科技计划联合计划(自然科学基金-面上项目)(No.2024-MSLH-271)

10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2026.03.19

评论