接受六自由度床联合一体板辅助盆腔放疗患者的不同定位方式比较OA
Comparison of different positioning methods for patients undergoing radiotherapy with assistant of 6DoF bed combined with integrated board at pelvic cavity
目的:通过对不同固定方式的比较分析盆腔放疗患者的摆位误差,选择可与六自由度床联合一体板配合较为理想的固定方式,为临床精准摆位提供参考.方法:回顾性选取2023年6月23日至2024年3月25日在北京大学第三医院肿瘤放疗科接受盆腔放疗的59例癌症患者的临床资料,男性16例,女性43例,年龄25~79岁,中位年龄48岁,其中子宫内膜癌术后5例、宫颈癌术后5例、原发宫颈癌17例、直肠癌27例及盆腔转移5例.将患者在CT定位时随机入组选择两种固定方式:热塑体网联合一体板固定组(A组,35例)和一体板联合负压真空垫组(B组,24例).两组患者均行锥形束CT(CBCT)图像验证摆位误差,将获取的6个方向的摆位误差分别表示为x(左右方向)、y(头脚方向)、z(腹背方向)、Rx(俯仰旋转方向)、Ry(滚动旋转方向)及Rz(左右旋转方向),记录治疗前摆位误差及校正后误差结果,两组数据均为分次内误差,进行数据分析比较,根据外放边界(margin)公式,利用分次内摆位误差计算出外放边界范围.结果:两组在六自由度床校正前后的摆位误差数据除Ry方向外,其余5个方向差异均有统计学意义(t=6.171、5.200、-16.066、7.259、-3.078,P<0.05).六自由度床校正前,A组的摆位误差在y(0.13±0.40)cm和Rx(-0.50±1.80)°方向上小于B组(0.20±0.47)cm和(0.81±1.54)°,差异均有统计学意义(t=3.205、-6.822,P<0.05),其余方向两组差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);六自由度床校正后,两组摆位误差在Rx、Ry及Rz方向差异均有统计学意义(t=-6.297、2.019、-3.711,P<0.05),且A组的摆位误差在Rx及Ry方向大于B组的摆位误差,A组的摆位误差在Rz方向小于B组的摆位误差,其余方向两组的摆位误差比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).六自由度床调整前A组x、y和z方向的计划靶区(PTV)外放边界分别为0.38、0.61及1.01 cm;B组的PTV外放边界分别为0.52、0.83及1.02 cm.六自由度床调整后A组x、y和z方向的PTV外放边界分别为0.06、0.05及0.15 cm;B组的PTV外放边界分别为0.10、0.13及0.28 cm.结论:在盆腔放疗患者中,使用六自由度床联合一体板利用热塑膜体网对患者进行固定,可以提高摆位精度,显著缩小PTV外放边界,在保证对肿瘤照射的同时,减少周围的正常组织器官照射剂量.
Objective:To analyze positioning errors in patients undergoing radiotherapy at pelvic cavity through compared different fixation methods,so as to select more ideal fixation method that can cooperate with six-degree-of-freedom(6DoF)bed that combined with integrated board,and to provide reference for precisely clinical positioning.Methods:We retrospectively selected clinical data of 59 patients with cancer who received radiotherapy at pelvic cavity at the Department of Radiotherapy,Peking University Third Hospital from June 23,2023 to March 25,2024.Among them,5 cases completed surgery for endometrial cancer,and 5 cases completed surgery for cervical cancer,and 17 cases were primarily cervical cancer,and 27 cases were rectal cancer,and 5 cases were pelvic metastasis.These patients included 16 males and 43 females,whose age ranged from 25 to 79 years(median age was 48 years).Patients were randomly divided into two fixation groups at the time of CT positioning:fixation group that adopted thermoplastic body mesh combined with integrated board(Group A,35 cases)and fixation group that integrated board combined with vacuum bag with negative pressure(Group B,24 cases).Both groups adopted images of cone beam computed tomography(CBCT)to verify positioning errors,and the obtained positioning errors at 6 directions were respectively expressed as x(left-right direction),y(head-foot direction),z(abdomen-back direction),Rx(pitch-rotation direction),Ry(roll-rotation direction)and Rz(left-right rotation direction)to record positioning error before treatment,and error results after calibration.The data of two groups were error within batches,and these data were analyzed and compared.Based on the formula of outward margin,the positioning errors within batches were used to calculate the range of outward margin.Results:The differences of positioning errors before and after calibration in 5 directions except Ry direction for 6DoF bed between two groups were significant(t=6.171,5.200,-16.066,7.259,-3.078,P<0.05).Before 6DoF bed was calibrated,the positioning errors in y(0.13±0.40 cm)and Rx(-0.50±1.80°)directions in group A were less than[((0.20±0.47 cm、0.81±1.54°)in group B,and the differences were significant(t=3.205,-6.822,P<0.05),while there were not significant differences in other two directions(P>0.05).After 6DoF bed was calibrated,the differences of positioning errors in Rr,Ry and Rz directions between two groups were significant(t=-6.297,2.019,-3.711,P<0.05).In addition,the positioning errors in Rx and Ry directions in group A were larger than those in group B,and the positioning error in Rz direction in group A was less than that in group B,and there were not significant differences at the positioning errors in other directions between two groups(P>0.05).Before 6DoF bed was adjusted,the outward margin values of planning target volume(PTV)in x,y and z directions of group A were respectively 0.38,0.61 and 1.01 cm.The PTV outward margin values in x,y and z directions of group B were respectively 0.52,0.83 and 1.02 cm at this time.After 6DoF bed was adjusted,the PTV outward margin values in x,y and z directions in group A were respectively 0.06,0.05 and 0.15 cm,and those in group B were respectively 0.10,0.13 and 0.28 cm.Conclusion:In patients undergoing radiotherapy at pelvic cavity,the application of 6DoF bed that combines with integrated board in fixing patients by using thermoplastic body mesh can improve positioning precision,and significantly narrow PTV outward margin,and reduce the exposure dose to surrounding normal tissues and organs when ensure radiation to tumor.
张瑞麟;赵田地;姜树坤;张佳爽;王俊杰
北京大学第三医院放疗科 北京 100191北京大学第三医院放疗科 北京 100191北京大学第三医院放疗科 北京 100191北京大学第三医院放疗科 北京 100191北京大学第三医院放疗科 北京 100191
医药卫生
盆腔放疗摆位误差六自由度床负压真空垫
Radiotherapy at pelvic cavityPositioning error6-degree-of-freedom(6DoF)bedVacuum cushion with negative-pressure
《中国医学装备》 2026 (2)
33-37,5
评论