首页|期刊导航|中国心理卫生杂志|爱丁堡产后抑郁量表中文版在产妇中的适应性验证

爱丁堡产后抑郁量表中文版在产妇中的适应性验证OACHSSCD

Cultural adaptation and validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale among postpartum women in China

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:引进爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)并进行本土化,在产妇群体中验证其效度和信度.方法:对EPDS英文版进行翻译、回译、专家委员会审议、预调查,形成EPDS中文版.选取湖南省两所妇幼保健院产后病房的产妇300 人,随机选取 100 例进行探索性因子分析,其余 200 例进行验证性因子分析.使用EPDS中文版对总样本进行筛查,随后由实施者以DSM-IV诊断标准为参照进行诊断性访谈.结果:探索性因子分析共提取 2 个公因子,因子负荷分别为 0.48~0.79 和 0.47~0.84,累积贡献率为55.33%;验证性因子分析结果显示模型拟合较好(χ2/df=2.09,RMR=0.02,RMSEA=0.07,GFI=0.94,NFI=0.88,CFI=0.93,IFI=0.94,TLI=0.91).EPDS中文版的Cronbach α系数为0.83,间隔24 h的重测信度为0.93.根据诊断性访谈结果,确定使用EPDS中文版筛查产后抑郁症的最佳临界值为 14/15分,此时灵敏度为 85.7%、特异度为94.5%、阳性预测值为 27.1%、阴性预测值为 99.6%;AUC为 0.94(95%CI:0.87~1.00).结论:爱丁堡产后抑郁量表中文版具有良好的效度和信度,可作为筛查产后抑郁症的有效工具,但需关注假阳性较高的问题.

Objective:To adapt and validate the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale(EPDS)for use among postpartum women,in China.Methods:The English version of the EPDS was translated,back-translated,reviewed by an expert panel,and pretested to develop the Chinese version.A total of 300 postpartum women were recruited from two maternal and child health hospitals in Hunan Province.Exploratory factor analysis(EFA)was conducted in a randomly selected 100 participants,while confirmatory factor analysis(CFA)was performed on the remaining 200.The participants completed the Chinese version of the EPDS,followed by diagnostic interviews based on DSM-IV diagnostic criteria.Results:EFA extracted two common factors,with factor loadings ranging from 0.48 to 0.79 and 0.47 to 0.84,respectively,and a cumulative variance contribution rate of 55.33%.CFA results indicated a good model fit(χ2/df=2.09,RMR=0.02,RMSEA=0.07,GFI=0.94,NFI=0.88,CFI=0.93,IFI=0.94,TLI=0.91).The Cronbach's αof the Chinese version of the EPDS was 0.83,the test-retest reliability was 0.93.Based on the results of diagnostic interviews,the optimal cutoff score for screening postpartum depression using the Chi-nese version of the EPDS was identified as 14/15,yielding a sensitivity of 85.7%,specificity of 94.5%,positive predictive value of 27.1%,and negative predictive value of 99.6%.The area under the curve(AUC)was 0.94(95%CI:0.87-1.00).Conclusion:The Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale(EPDS)demonstrates good validity and reliability and could be used as an effective tool for screening postpartum depression.However,attention should be paid to the issue of high false-positive rates.

吴瑕;翁丽君;柏艳萍;王英雯;谢怡媚;曾榛;董子瑶;龚雯洁

中南大学湘雅公共卫生学院儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系,长沙 410013中南大学湘雅公共卫生学院儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系,长沙 410013中南大学湘雅公共卫生学院儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系,长沙 410013中南大学湘雅公共卫生学院儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系,长沙 410013中南大学湘雅公共卫生学院儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系,长沙 410013中南大学湘雅公共卫生学院儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系,长沙 410013中南大学湘雅公共卫生学院儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系,长沙 410013中南大学湘雅公共卫生学院儿少卫生与妇幼保健学系,长沙 410013||芙蓉实验室,长沙 410078||伯明翰大学应用健康科学系,英国伯明翰 B152TT||罗切斯特大学医学中心行为医学与精神病学系,美国纽约罗切斯特 14642

医药卫生

爱丁堡产后抑郁量表产后抑郁翻译适应性验证效度信度

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scalepostpartum depressiontranslationcultural adaptationvalidityreliability

《中国心理卫生杂志》 2026 (3)

257-262,6

国家自然科学基金(81973059、82273643),湖南省自然科学青年科学基金A类(2025 JJ 20095),湖南省自然科学基金(2023JJ30712)

10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2026.03.12

评论