首页|期刊导航|党政研究|地方政府政务数据共享模式的类型比较研究

地方政府政务数据共享模式的类型比较研究OACHSSCD

A Comparative Study on the Types of Local Government Data Sharing Models

中文摘要英文摘要

我国地方政府政务数据共享实践呈现"同题异答"图景.基于"控制权—行动目标"二维框架,地方多元化模式可归结为整合控制型、权威动员型、赋能服务型与市场驱动型这四种类型.整合控制型模式依托技术强制与标准构建提高数据效能,权威动员型模式依靠高位协调实现壁垒突破,赋能服务型模式通过数据返还助力基层减负,市场驱动型模式则借助产权界定激活数据要素价值.差异化模式源于地方政府基于特定场景的"策略性适配"以及对现有资源的"创造性重组",国家层面也应构建和完善差异化的赋能激励机制、共享策略工具箱与分类监管措施,进一步吸纳和优化地方实践创新.

The government data sharing practice of local governments in China presents a picture of"different answers to the same ques-tion".Based on the two-dimensional framework of"control right-action goal",the local diversification models can be divided into four types:integrated control type,authority mobilization type,empowerment service type and market-driven type.The integrated control model relies on technical mandate and standard construction to improve data efficiency,the authority mobilization model relies on high-level coor-dination to achieve barrier breakthrough,the empowerment service model helps reduce the burden at the grass-roots level through data re-turn,and the market driven model confirms the value of activating data elements through property rights.The differentiated models stems from the"strategic adaptation"of local governments based on specific scenarios and the"creative reorganization"of existing resources.The national level should also build and improve differentiated empowerment incentive mechanisms,shared strategy toolboxes and classified regu-latory measures to further absorb and optimize local practice innovation.

樊浩

河南师范大学政治与公共管理学院,河南 新乡453007

社会科学

地方政府政务数据数据共享

local governmentgovernment datadata sharing

《党政研究》 2026 (1)

46-55,10

国家资助博士后研究人员计划"民主治理实践的算法化转型及其风险解耦机制研究"(GZC20252487)中国博士后科学基金面上资助"智能行政裁量责任风险的场景化生成机理与适配规制研究"(2025M783784)

评论