首页|期刊导航|西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)|论我国治安违法记录的封存与例外

论我国治安违法记录的封存与例外OACHSSCD

On the Sealing and Exceptions of Public Order Violation Records in China

中文摘要英文摘要

治安违法记录封存制度的实质在于"严格限制查询",旨在匡正当前因信息滥用导致的权利受限问题.在界分封存与查询、消灭、复权等相近概念的前提下,封存制度"例外查询"的客观标准在于:一为国家机关办案需要,"办案需要"应狭义解释为办理刑事案件、监察案件以及公安机关办理其他关联治安案件的活动;二为有关单位根据国家规定,"国家规定"应严格限定为全国人民代表大会及其常务委员会制定的法律,以及国务院制定的行政法规.此外,基于制度的完整性与前瞻性,有必要将"危害政治安全""屡教不改的惯犯""本人为自身查询"等情形纳入未来立法或司法解释中予以考量.

The essence of the system for sealing public order violation records lies in the"strict restriction of inquiry",aiming to rectify the current issue of rights restriction caused by information misuse.On the premise of distinguishing sealing from related concepts such as inquiry,expungement,and rehabilitation,the objective criteria for"exceptional inquiry"under the sealing system are as follows:first,inquiries by state organs for case handling needs,where"case handling needs"should be narrowly interpreted as activities related to handling criminal cases,supervision cases,and other associated public order cases by public security organs;second,inquiries by relevant units in accordance with national regulations,where"national regulations"should be strictly limited to laws enacted by the National People's Congress and its Standing Committee,as well as administrative regulations formulated by the State Council.Furthermore,based on the completeness and forward-looking nature of the system,it is necessary to consider incorporating circumstances such as"endangering political security,""habitual offenders who repeatedly violate the law,"and"individuals inquiring about their own records"into future legislation or judicial interpretations.

赵冠男;鲁婧扬

湖南师范大学法学院湖南师范大学法学院

治安违法记录原则封存例外查询

public order violation recordssealing in principleexceptional inquiry

《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (1)

16-31,16

2024年度司法部法治建设与法学理论研究项目"行刑反向衔接机制问题研究"(24SFB4010)

评论