论轻罪犯罪记录封存的类型推进与公众认同OACHSSCD
On the Categorical Advancement and Public Acceptance of Sealing Minor Offense Records
轻罪案件在犯罪结构中占比持续上升,犯罪记录带来的终身性社会排斥效应日益凸显,构建并完善轻罪犯罪记录封存制度成为一项紧迫的治理课题.为弥合法律理念与社会认知之间的差异,本文提出通过"类型推进"与"公众认同"双路径协同实施轻罪犯罪记录封存制度.类型推进聚焦于制度的具体操作,依据行为性质、刑罚轻重、职业关联及人身危险性等因素,对封存适用作出阶梯化、差异化的分类安排;公众认同则注重通过司法释明、试点示范与案例宣传等方式,引导形成理性包容的社会共识.二者协同形成轻罪封存制度落地与社会接纳的双重支撑,旨在实现惩罚与修复、秩序与自由之间的动态平衡,推动刑事治理向更人性化、理性化的方向发展.
The proportion of minor offense cases within China's crime structure has continued to rise,and the lifelong social exclusion effect resulting from criminal records has become increasingly prominent.Establishing and improving a system for sealing minor offense records has thus emerged as an urgent governance issue.To bridge the gap between legal principles and societal perception,this paper proposes a dual-path approach coordinated through"categorical advancement"and"public acceptance building".Categorical advancement focuses on concretizing institutional implementation by creating a tiered and differentiated classification framework for the application of record sealing,based on factors such as the nature of the conduct,severity of punishment,occupational relevance,and personal risk.Public acceptance building emphasizes the systematic cultivation of rational and inclusive social consensus through judicial interpretation,pilot demonstrations,and case publicity.Together,these two paths provide dual support for both institutional implementation and societal acceptance,aiming to achieve a dynamic balance between punishment and rehabilitation,as well as between order and freedom,thereby advancing criminal governance toward a more humane and rational direction.
张杰;董津秀
中南大学法学院||中南大学数字法治研究院中南大学法学院
轻罪犯罪记录封存制度类型推进公众认同犯罪附随后果
sealing minor offense recordscategorical advancementpublic acceptancecollateral consequences of crime
《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2026 (1)
1-15,15
2025年度国家社科基金重点项目"数字时代司法公共表达的范式转换与路径优化研究"(25AFX016)
评论