中共早期组织名称问题研究评析OACHSSCD
Analysis of the Researches on the Issue of Early Organizational Names of the CPC
自20世纪70年代末以降,学术界围绕"共产主义小组"名称问题展开了热烈讨论,主要涉及该名称是否是历史原名、最早出自何处、有关文献为何使用该名称、它又是如何流传开来的、继续使用是否合适、中共早期组织的历史原名等问题.围绕这些问题展开的讨论,学术成果丰硕,各种观点纷呈.有些问题已经形成或基本形成共识,如"共产主义小组"不是历史上的原名,"共产党早期组织"代替"共产主义小组"上升成主流观点等.已经形成或基本形成共识的问题,仍有进一步探讨的空间,因为"共产党早期组织"也不是历史上的原名.有些问题仍存在较大分歧,研究成果相对比较薄弱,如中共早期组织的历史原名.中共早期组织名称问题,是一个需要学术界继续关注的问题.
Since the late 1970s,there has been a heated debate in academic community about the issue of the name"Communist Group",mainly involving whether the name is the original historical name,where it first came from,why the relevant documents use the name,how it spread,whether it is appropriate to continue to use it,and the historical original name of the early organization of the CPC.The discussions around these issues have yielded fruitful academic results and diverse view-points.Some issues have already formed or basically formed a consensus,such as the fact that the"Communist Group"is not the original name in history,and the"Early Communist Organizations"replacing the"Communist Group"as the mainstream viewpoint.There is still room for further dis-cussion on issues that have already formed or have basically formed a consensus,because the"Early Communist Organizations"is not its original name in history.There are still major differences on some issues,and the research results are relatively weak,such as the historical original name of the early organization of the CPC.The issue of the name of the early organization of the CPC is a matter that requires continued attention from the academic community.
黄爱军
安徽财经大学马克思主义学院(安徽蚌埠 233041)
中共早期组织名称共产主义小组历史原名评析
early organization of the CPCname"Communist Group"historical original nameanalysis
《苏区研究》 2026 (1)
13-36,24
安徽省高等学校科学研究重点项目"淮南、皖江抗日根据地党风廉政建设研究"(2022AH0505)
评论