增长联盟视角下乡村空间治理模式对比研究OACHSSCD

In the context of the rural revitalization strategy,how to achieve intensive land use,industrial integrated innovation,and land value conversion through the optimization of spatial governance has become a key path to addressing the predicament of rural development.By introducing the growth alliance theory and integrating local practices,the typical growth alliance model of existing rural spatial governance was summarized in this study.Moreover,how different subjects influence the implementation path,effect,and limitations of rural spatial governance through interest coordination,power games,and resource integration were analyzed.This study aimed to expand the rural application of growth alliance theory and provide theoretical supports and practices to explore differentiated spatial governance in the context of rural revitalization. The research findings show that in the transformation of the urban-rural dual structure,and as a result of different location conditions and resource endowments,rural spatial governance has evolved into three growth coalition models:urban renewal-oriented,local revitalization-oriented,and urban-rural integration-oriented.These three models exhibit significant differences in profit-seeking orientation,alliance characteristics,and governance responses. Urban villages are located within or adjacent to urban spatial scopes.Their renovation is regarded as an unconventional form of rural spatial operation,representing rural spatial governance under the stress of urban growth[21].Due to its favorable location,the collective land in urban villages has prominent advantages compared to other villages in breaking property right constraints,thus offering enormous potential for high market transaction value.The share of land transfer fees and real estate returns after the conversion of collective land to state-owned land has become the core growth driver and profit-seeking direction for such villages.Under the urban renewal-oriented model,transaction value is released through spatial empowerment and planning deregulation,forming an interest distribution mechanism dominated by village collectives and developers. For suburban villages located on the periphery of cities,direct access to urbanization dividends is constrained by their location.Its market transaction value remains extremely limited,although property right constraints are lifted and land is state-owned.Therefore,the only viable path is to leverage local rural resources,optimize the adaptability of land to rural revitalization industries,maximize the spatial use value of land,and thereby seek growth paths and momentum for local revitalization.The formation of specific growth alliances in this process has become the core logic for the development of peripheral rural areas.In other words,a collaborative development framework involving the government,village collectives,and enterprises was constructed under the"local revitalization-oriented"model,and the use value of land is improved through spatial rearrangement and institutional innovation. Peri-urban villages that are adjacent to cities possess favorable urban locations while avoiding the coercion of traditional urban"growth machines"to a certain extent due to their location at the urban-rural integration boundary,thus forming a unique rural growth alliance and spatial governance model for integrated development.Under the urban-rural integration-oriented model,it emphasizes the dual considerations regarding land use value and transaction value,offers responses to the rural spatial governance model through land consolidation and capital circulation,and establishes a multi-win mechanism involving the government,state-owned enterprises,other market-oriented enterprises,and village collectives. Fairness and justice remain indispensable in growth alliance theory.Although this study argues that anti-growth forces within rural growth alliances can be mitigated,vigilance must be maintained against the risk of imbalance in spatial justice caused by the excessive instrumental rationalization of growth coalitions.Special attention should be paid to the potential impact of overlapping"citizen-villager"identities on the formation of anti-growth alliances against the background of the future two-way flow of urban-rural factors.For example,with the downturn of the real estate market and the rationalization of compensation standards,village collectives and villagers often hinder the implementation of urban village renovation,playing the role of anti-growth alliances.Future research can further strengthen the discussion on institutional design from the perspective of social equity.