首页|期刊导航|南方建筑|文化韧性视角下岭南梳式布局村落景观空间研究

文化韧性视角下岭南梳式布局村落景观空间研究OACHSSCD

Research on Landscape Space of Lingnan Villages with Comb-Style Layout from the Perspective of Cultural Resilience

中文摘要英文摘要

传统村落活态传承面临空间、文化与治理等多维系统性挑战.为了突破岭南梳式布局村落静态保护模式的局限,从文化韧性视角构建景观空间韧性评价体系,以揭示其内在韧性机制并支撑精准治理.采用AHP与耦合协调度综合评价模型,对4个典型村落样本进行量化分析.结果显示:①村落文化韧性并非由单一要素优势决定,而取决于空间结构、文化功能与社会网络之间是否形成正向的协同关系.②社会网络通过内部整合与外部联结,在文化价值转化过程中发挥中介作用;外部干预对韧性提升的效果取决于其与村落内部结构匹配程度.研究表明,基于韧性评价结果识别优势与短板,并实施差异化干预,有助于推动该类村落景观空间的活态传承与可持续发展.

The living inheritance of traditional villages faces multidimensional challenges under the combined effects of rapid urbanization and tourism development,including fragmented spatial patterns,weakened cultural practices,and insufficient governance coordination.There are long-term static protection limitations regarding Lingnan villages with a comb-style layout,which have been focusing on morphological preservation and landscape improvement while relatively neglecting the continuous supply of cultural functions and the adaptation of governance processes.To address these limitations,an evaluation system for landscape spatial resilience orienting to the coupling relationships of spatial structure,cultural functions,and governance process was established from the perspective of cultural resilience,aiming to recognize resilience differences,clarify the action mechanism,and support precise governance.In this study,four typical Lingnan villages with a comb-style layout were selected as samples,and indicators were set according to four subsystems:cultural inheritance,cultural value,ecological resources,and social networks.Archival materials,field surveys and mapping,in-depth interviews,and questionnaires were combined to acquire data for quantitative,standard,and consistency tests of indicators.The analytic hierarchy process(AHP)was applied to determine the weights of indicators and conduct comprehensive evaluations.Moreover,a coupling coordination degree model was introduced to characterize the interactions and synergy levels among subsystems,testing the logic of resilience formation from a systemic relationship perspective and identifying key links and constraints affecting coordination.The research findings are as follows:① The cultural resilience of villages is not determined by the advantage of a single element but depends on whether spatial structure,cultural functions,and social networks can form positive synergies.Spatial structural stability provides a carrier for cultural practices,cultural functional activity supports value reproduction,and the organizational mobilization and rule enforcement capabilities of social networks influence resource integration efficiency.When structural protection is disconnected from functional utilization,or when governance processes fail to support cultural reproduction,a state of prominent heritage advantages but insufficient synergy may emerge.② Social networks play a critical mediating role in cultural value transformation through internal integration and external linkages.Internal integration is reflected in the support of community organizations and negotiation mechanisms for collective action,whereas external linkages are manifested in the ability to connect with governments,markets,and social organizations.Internal integration and external linkages collectively influence the continuous transformation of cultural resources and risk-response capabilities.③ External interventions for resilience enhancement require compatibility.Restoration,business introduction,and project interventions can promote element synergy and value gains only when aligned with the spatial fabric,social structure,and cultural practices.Mismatches may lead to symbolic utilization,weakened community participation,and systemic imbalance.Based on the evaluation and collaborative diagnosis results,some differentiated intervention pathways premised on the identification of"strength-shortage"combinations were proposed:The spatial intervention emphasized the continuous maintenance of the comb-style layout pattern and the revitalization of public space vitality.The cultural intervention strengthened the continuous production of inheritance fields and local narratives to shift cultural functions from display-oriented to daily-life-oriented.The governance intervention enhanced community capability in organization and connection with the external world,established a mechanism for multi-subject negotiation and resource co-governance,and promoted multiple subsystems to form sustainable positive feedback.Generally speaking,a comprehensive evaluation and collaborative diagnosis from the perspective of cultural resilience can provide greater explanatory and operational support,transforming Lingnan traditional villages with comb-style layouts from a static protection to a living inheritance,promoting the sustainable development of village landscape spaces.

李晓琼;贺华蓉;张从如

合肥工业大学建筑与艺术学院合肥工业大学建筑与艺术学院合肥工业大学建筑与艺术学院

建筑与水利

文化韧性韧性评估梳式布局协同机制

cultural resilienceresilience evaluationcomb-style layoutsynergistic mechanism

《南方建筑》 2026 (2)

21-29,9

安徽省研究生教育质量工程项目(2025zyxwjxalk334):设计专业学位研究生教学案例库安徽省社会科学创新发展研究课题(2024CXQ061):乡愁视域下皖南传统村落文化景观空间视觉吸引机制及保护路径研究.

10.3969/j.issn.1000-0232.2026.02.003

评论