空调系统参与电力需求响应效果评价OA
Evaluation of Effect of Air Conditioning Systems Participating in Power Demand Response
针对供冷工况,建立风机盘管空调系统模型.基于温度再设需求响应策略,从峰值功耗削减率、节电率评价空调系统参与电力需求响应效果.调整方案1:13:00-15:00设定温度为(27±1)℃,其他时间仍为(26±1)℃.调整方案2:13:00-15:00设定温度为(28±1)℃,其他时间仍为(26±1)℃.参与电力需求响应期间,调整方案1的峰值功耗由原始方案的46.2 kW降至38.7 kW,峰值功耗削减率为16.2%.调整方案2的峰值功耗由原始方案的46.2 kW降至32.3 kW,峰值功耗削减率为30.1%.模拟日原始方案、调整方案1、调整方案2的耗电量分别为604.45、595.03、587.37 kW·h,调整方案1、2的节电率分别为1.56%、2.83%.空调系统参与电力需求响应期间,适当提高设定温度,基本不影响室内舒适性,有助于峰值功耗削减和节电.
According to the cooling conditions,a fan coil air conditioning system model was established.Based on the temperature reset demand response strat-egy,the effect of the air conditioning system participat-ing in power demand response was evaluated using peak power consumption reduction rate and power sav-ing rate.Adjustment scheme 1:Set temperature to(27±1)℃ from 13:00 to 15:00,and maintain(26±1)℃ at other times.Adjustment scheme 2:Set temperature to(28±1)℃ from 13:00 to 15:00,and maintain(26±1)℃at other times.During the period of power demand re-sponse,the peak power consumption decreased from 46.2 kW in the original scheme to 38.7 kW(a 16.2%reduction)in the adjustment scheme 1 and to 32.3 kW(a 30.1%reduction)in the adjustment scheme 2.The power consumptions of the original scheme,the adjust-ment scheme 1,and the adjustment scheme 2 on the simulation day were 604.45,595.03,and 587.37 kW·h respectively.The power saving rates of the adjustment schemes 1 and 2 were 1.56%and 2.83%respectively.During the period when the air conditioning system par-ticipates in power demand response,appropriately in-creasing the set temperature basically does not affect indoor comfort,and helps reduce peak power consump-tion and save electricity.
朱元志;高岩
北京建筑大学供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程北京市重点实验室,北京 100044北京建筑大学北京节能减排与城乡可持续发展协同创新中心,北京 100044
建筑与水利
空调系统电力需求响应温度再设节电率
air conditioning systempower demand re-sponsetemperature resetpower saving rate
《煤气与热力》 2026 (2)
28-34,7
评论