木醋液的高值化利用研究及环境效益分析OA
High-value Utilization of Wood Vinegar and Its Environmental Benefit Analysis
为实现木醋液的高效利用,采用有机溶剂对木醋液进行萃取,萃取相进行酚类产物回收和高值化利用,萃余相进行厌氧消化产甲烷,未经萃取木醋液记为AS,并利用生命周期评价(LCA)模拟分析此工艺工业化应用的环境影响.研究结果表明:二氯甲烷(DCM)、乙醚(Et2 O)和乙酸乙酯(EtOAc)3 种萃取剂均能有效保留木醋液中的挥发性脂肪酸(VFA),其中二氯甲烷的保留效果最佳,其次为乙酸乙酯.萃取相富集以苯酚为主的酚类,其中乙酸乙酯富集效果最好,乙醚次之.中温厌氧消化实验结果显示:木醋液产甲烷潜力(以化学需氧量(COD)质量计)为41.92 L/kg,经二氯甲烷和乙酸乙酯萃取后的萃余相AS-DCM、AS-EtOAc产甲烷潜力分别提高至65.83 和66.21 L/kg,而乙醚萃取后的萃余相AS-Et2 O产甲烷潜力则降低.LCA分析表明:与木醋液直接厌氧消化相比,增加乙酸乙酯萃取单元可有效缓解系统在生态毒性潜力、富营养化潜力和全球变暖潜力方面的环境影响,3 个指标数据分别仅为原工艺的67%、79%和60%,表现出最低的综合环境影响;但若以乙醚作为萃取剂,则会加剧系统的环境负面影响.综上所述,在木醋液精制后进行厌氧消化时,若以提高甲烷产量为目标,推荐使用二氯甲烷或乙酸乙酯作为萃取剂;若以生态环境效益为优先,则乙酸乙酯为最佳选择.
To achieve efficient utilization of wood vinegar,this study proposed an organic solvent extraction process,in which the extract phase was used for phenol recovery,while the raffinate phase underwent anaerobic digestion for methane production,and untreated wood vinegar was recorded as AS.A life cycle assessment(LCA)was conducted to evaluate the environmental impact of this process in industrial application.The results showed that dichloromethane(DCM),diethyl ether(Et2 O),and ethyl acetate(EtOAc)extract effectively retained the volatile fatty acids(VFA)in wood vinegar,with dichloromethane performing the best,followed by ethyl acetate.The extract phase was enriched with phenolic compounds,primarily phenol,with ethyl acetate achieving the highest enrichment.Mesophilic anaerobic digestion experiments revealed that untreated wood vinegar had a methane production potential(chemical oxygen demand(COD)mass meter)of 41.92 L/kg.After extraction with dichloromethane and ethyl acetate,methane production potential increased to 65.83 L/kg and 66.21 L/kg of the extract residue phase AS-DCM and AS-EtOAc,respectively,whereas diethyl ether extraction(AS-Et2 O)reduced methane potential.LCA analysis indicated that adding an ethyl acetate extraction unit reduced environmental impacts in terms of ecological toxicity potential,eutrophication potential,and global warming potential.The data for these three metrics are only 67%,79% and 60% of the original process,respectively,achieving the lowest overall impact.In contrast,diethyl ether increased negative impacts of the process.In conclusion,dichloromethane and ethyl acetate are recommended extractants to enhance methane production.For ecological benefits,ethyl acetate is the optimal choice.
胡杨;汪佳钰;崔家豪;牛雨薇;卢辛成;孙康;徐芙清
西安交通大学 人居环境与建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710100西安交通大学 人居环境与建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710100西安交通大学 人居环境与建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710100西安交通大学 人居环境与建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710100中国林业科学研究院林产化学工业研究所,江苏 南京 210042中国林业科学研究院林产化学工业研究所,江苏 南京 210042西安交通大学 人居环境与建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710100
化学化工
木醋液厌氧消化甲烷潜力生命周期评价
wood vinegaranaerobic digestionmethane potentiallife cycle assessment
《林产化学与工业》 2026 (1)
65-72,8
陕西省重点研发计划资助项目(2022ZDLNY02)
评论