首页|期刊导航|中国劳动关系学院学报|算法民主:数字劳动权益保障的上海探索

算法民主:数字劳动权益保障的上海探索OACHSSCD

Algorithmic Democracy:Shanghai's Initiative to Safeguard Digital Labor Rights and Interests

中文摘要英文摘要

随着数字经济蓬勃发展,算法压榨及其所导致的数字劳动者权益保障问题日益凸显.本研究基于协商民主理论,提出数字时代算法民主治理的"主体—规制—共识"分析框架,并以上海市、区两级工会介入饿了么平台算法协商民主恳谈实践为案例,探究数字劳动权益保障的民主治理新路径.研究发现:在主体层面,通过党建引领,数字平台与劳动者协同参与算法民主治理网络,实现了对分散化劳动力的再组织;在规制层面,以算法协商恳谈会作为正式协商制度,将算法规则本身纳入协商议程,实现从"事后维权"向"事中协商"的范式转变;在共识层面,各方逐步超越单纯的技术效率逻辑,就算法向善价值原则达成共识,推动算法优化落地.上海的实践表明,面对数字智能时代新挑战,通过党建引领的算法民主,发挥正式和非正式规制的兜底作用,凝聚多元主题的价值共识,是保障数字劳动者权益的一种有益探索.

With the rapid development of the digital economy,algorithm exploitation and the resulting challenges in safeguarding digital laborers' rights and interests are becoming increasingly prominent.Based on deliberative democracy,this study proposes an"actor-regulation-consensus"analytical framework for algorithmic democratic governance in the digital age.Using the case of democratic deliberation talks on algorithms involving Shanghai's municipal and district-level trade unions intervening in the Ele.me platform,it explores new democratic governance paths for protecting digital labor rights.The findings indicate that,at the actor level,through Party building guidance,digital platforms and laborers collaboratively participate in the algorithmic democratic governance network,achieving the re-organization of dispersed labor forces;at the regulation level,using algorithm deliberation talks as a formal consultation system incorporates the algorithm rules themselves into the deliberation agenda,realizing a paradigm shift from"ex-post right s protection"to"in-process deliberation";at the consensus level,stakeholders gradually move beyond a purely technical efficiency logic,reaching consensus on the value principle of"algorithms for good",and promoting the implementation of algorithm optimizations.Overall,the case demonstrates that,facing new challenges in the era of digital intelligence,algorithmic democracy guided by Party building,leveraging the safety-net role of formal and informal regulations,and consolidating value consensus among diverse actors is a beneficial exploration for safeguarding the rights and interests of digital laborers.

葛天任;代琛

同济大学 政治与国际关系学院,上海 200092同济大学 政治与国际关系学院,上海 200092

管理科学

数字劳动算法民主劳动权益保障协商民主

digital laboralgorithmic democracylabor rights protectiondeliberative democracy

《中国劳动关系学院学报》 2026 (1)

114-124,11

本研究获得同济大学人文社科学术新锐支持计划(项目编号:2024XR03)资助,系中国工程院重点咨询项目"智能社会风险国际合作治理研究"(项目编号:2025XZ10)的阶段性研究成果.

评论