首页|期刊导航|电力科技与环保|基于Koopman算子的超超临界火电机组模型预测控制

基于Koopman算子的超超临界火电机组模型预测控制OA

Model predictive control of ultra-supercritical thermal power units based on Koopman operator

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]双碳目标下,为加速火电机组从主力型电源向提供调峰调频服务的辅助型电源角色转型,提升机组的负荷响应能力至关重要.传统控制方法在火电机组大范围变负荷运行过程中,容易出现响应不及时、稳态精度差、计算量大等问题.[方法]本文以某1 000 MW超超临界火电机组协调控制系统为研究对象,提出了一种基于Koopman算子的模型预测控制(Koopman model predictive control,KMPC)方法.该方法采用4阶龙格库塔法离散化原非线性系统获取数据集,通过扩展动态模态分解法有限维近似Koopman算子构建机组高维线性近似模型,并基于该模型预测系统未来动态,引入滚动时域优化策略,综合考虑控制约束、控制目标和性能指标等约束条件,设计超超临界火电机组的模型预测控制算法.以局部线性MPC(local-linear model predictive control,LMPC)为基准对比算法,通过仿真实验验证本文所提出的KMPC算法的有效性.[结果]研究表明,对应于机组的主蒸汽压力、分离器蒸汽焓值、汽轮机发电功率,(1)在连续阶跃升负荷仿真实验中高维近似系统与原非线性系统输出量相对均方根误差分别为1.00%,0.40%和0.36%;(2)标称工况下,KMPC算法在升负荷实验中输出量的时间加权绝对误差积分(integral of time-weighted absolute error,ITAE)相较LMPC分别减少了46.67%、48.66%和21.46%;(3)在模型失配工况下,相较于LMPC算法,KMPC算法在升负荷实验中输出量的ITAE分别减少了19.57%、22.45%和30.94%.[结论]基于Koopman算子构建的高维线性近似模型可较为精准捕捉原系统非线性动力学特征;与LMPC算法相比,KMPC算法在机组大范围变负荷运行过程中响应更加及时且稳态误差更小,同时表现出更强的鲁棒性,有利于机组现场运行.

[Objective]In the context of achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals,it is crucial for the thermal power plants to improve the load response capability to accelerate their transition from primary power sources to auxiliary units that provide peak shaving and frequency regulation services.Traditional control methods often face challenges such as delayed responses,poor steady-state accuracy,and high computational complexity during wide-range load variation operations..[Methods]To address the above issues,this paper takes the coordinated control system of a 1 000 MW ultra-supercritical coal-fired power unit as the research object,and proposes a Koopman operator-based model predictive control(KMPC)method.First,the original nonlinear system is discretized using the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method to generate a dataset.Based on extended dynamic mode decomposition,a finite-dimensional approximation of the Koopman operator is constructed to obtain a high-dimensional linear approximation model of the power unit.Based on this model,the system's future dynamics are predicted,and a receding horizon optimization strategy is introduced,in which control constraints,control objectives,and performance metrics are comprehensively considered.A Koopman model predictive control algorithm is then designed for the ultra-supercritical thermal power units.The effectiveness of the proposed KMPC method is validated through simulation experiments,with the local linear MPC(LMPC)serving as the benchmark.[Results]Corresponding to the unit's main steam pressure,separator steam enthalpy,steam turbine power generation of these three quantities,the results of this study are summarized as follows:(1)In the load-ramping simulation with successive step increases,the relative root mean square errors between the high-dimensional approximate model and the original nonlinear system outputs were 1.00%,0.40%,and 0.36%,respectively.(2)Under nominal operating conditions,the KMPC algorithm reduced the integral of time-weighted absolute error(ITAE)of the outputs by 46.67%,48.66%,and 21.46%compared with the LMPC algorithm in the load-increasing experiment.(3)Under model mismatch conditions,the KMPC algorithm reduced the ITAE of the outputs by 19.57%,22.45%,and 30.94%compared with the LMPC algorithm in the load-increasing experiment.[Conclusion]The above experimental results demonstrate that the high-dimensional linear approximation model constructed using the Koopman operator can accurately capture the nonlinear dynamic characteristics of the original system.Compared with LMPC algorithm,the KMPC algorithm provides a faster response and smaller steady-state errors during wide-range load variations.Moreover,it demonstrates enhanced robustness,which is beneficial for practical implementation in thermal power plant operations.

黄超;章丽;张怡;吴振龙

华北电力大学控制与计算机工程学院,北京 昌平 102206华北电力大学控制与计算机工程学院,北京 昌平 102206华北电力大学控制与计算机工程学院,北京 昌平 102206郑州大学电气与信息工程学院,河南 郑州 450001

能源科技

火电机组变负荷运行协调控制Koopman算子模型预测控制

thermal power unitload-variation operationcoordinated controlKoopman operatormodel predictive control

《电力科技与环保》 2026 (1)

115-125,11

国家自然科学基金项目(52106007)

10.19944/j.eptep.1674-8069.2026.01.012

评论