国内外替代燃料标准体系浅析OA

[Objective]In order to promote the large-scale application of alternative fuels in the coal power industry and help achieve the dual-carbon goal.[Methods]This paper combs through the development history of alternative fuel standards in developed countries such as the European Union,the United States and Japan,focuses on comparing the differences between them and China in terms of product quality standards,preparation and testing standards,and pollution emission control standards,and analyses them in conjunction with the policy incentive system.[Results](1)In the standard system:China's current standards are group standards(e.g.,T/CIC046-2021),lacking in mandatory;heavy metal limits(except mercury)are missing,while the EU's EN15359-2011 and ISO 21640 have already set up a grading system;(2)Mismatch of emissions standards:China's Co-disposal of coal-fired power plants needs to cross-reference the'domestic waste incineration standards','boiler pollutant emission standards'and other standards,there is no specific specification,while the EU through the Industrial Emissions Directive to unify the co-firing emission limits;(3)policy incentives are missing:China's lack of carbon emissions related tariff subsidies,while the EU through the Renewable Energy Directive to provide incentives for the 45 euros/(MW·h).[Conclusion]China needs to establish a mandatory national standard system:(1)improve product quality grading,strict chlorine content limits,heavy metal limits and testing methods;(2)develop special emission standards for co-incineration;(3)support carbon accounting rules and economic incentives to stabilise the raw material supply chain,and to promote the application of alternative fuels to reduce pollution and carbon emissions.