DRG视阈下中医医院绩效管理的挑战与优化策略OA
Challenges and optimization strategies for performance management in traditional Chinese medicine hospitals from the perspective of DRG
目的 基于医保支付方式改革背景,系统评价某三级甲等中医类医院分阶段实施两轮绩效管理模式对医疗服务能力、效率及医保监管的影响机制,为中医类医院绩效管理策略优化提供参考.方法 按两轮改革时点将131 079例患者分成3组,采用中断时间序列分析两轮改革前后医疗服务能力、效率及医保监管的趋势变化,并运用非参数检验分析住院费用结构差异.结果 目标绩效管理期:医疗服务能力无显著提升(CMI月均上升0.004,P>0.05);医疗服务效率优化有限(CMI标化平均住院日、例均费用分别下降0.002天/月、40.39元/月,耗占比、医疗服务费占比分别上升0.24%/月、0.12%/月,P均>0.05);医保亏损加剧(例均结余金额下降19.05元/月,P<0.01).联合管理期:医疗服务能力受抑制(CMI月均下降0.01,P<0.001);医疗服务效率显著提升(CMI标化平均住院日、例均费用、耗占比分别下降0.06天/月、165.22元/月、0.07%/月,医疗服务费占比上升0.42%/月,P均<0.05);医保扭亏为盈(例均结余由-170.67元增至142.82元,增长趋势不显著).结论 两轮绩效管理模式对医疗服务能力、效率及医保平衡的影响存在阶段性差异,需通过动态分阶段调整绩效方案.
Objective Based on the context of medical insurance payment reform,this study systematically evaluates the impact mechanism of two phased performance management models implemented in a tertiary traditional Chinese medicine hospital on medical service capacity,efficiency,and medical insurance supervision.It aims to provide references for optimizing perform-ance management strategies in traditional Chinese medicine hospitals.Methods A total of 131,079 patients were divided into three groups according to the time points of the two rounds of reforms.Interrupted time series analysis was used to analyze the trends in medical service capacity,efficiency,and medical insurance supervision before and after the reforms,and non-paramet-ric tests were applied to examine differences in the structure of hospitalization costs.Results Target Performance Management Phase:Medical service capacity showed no significant improvement(average monthly increase in CMI:0.004,P>0.05);med-ical service efficiency improved only marginally(CMI-standardized average hospital stay decreased by 0.002 days/month,aver-age cost per case decreased by 40.39 yuan/month,while the proportion of consumables and medical service fees increased by 0.24%/month and 0.12%/month,respectively,P>0.05 for all);medical insurance losses worsened(average surplus per case decreased by 19.05 yuan/month,P<0.01).Combined Management Phase:Medical service capacity was suppressed(average monthly decrease in CMI:0.01,P<0.001);medical service efficiency significantly improved(CMI-standardized average hospi-tal stay,average cost per case,and proportion of consumables decreased by 0.06 days/month,165.22 yuan/month,and 0.07%/month,respectively,while the proportion of medical service fees increased by 0.42%/month,P<0.05 for all);medi-cal insurance turned from loss to profit(average surplus per case increased from-170.67 yuan to 142.82 yuan,though the growth trend was not significant).Conclusion The two rounds of performance management models have phased differences in their im-pact on medical service capacity,efficiency,and medical insurance balance.Dynamic and phased adjustments to performance management strategies are required.
陈建勋;曹利君;刘家宇;梁画
攀枝花学院附属医院 四川攀枝花 617000攀枝花学院附属医院 四川攀枝花 617000攀枝花学院附属医院 四川攀枝花 617000攀枝花学院附属医院 四川攀枝花 617000
医药卫生
医保支付方式改革中断时间序列分析绩效管理
Medical insurance payment reformInterrupted time series analysisPerformance management
《现代医院》 2026 (1)
91-95,5
四川省医学会医学科研项目和青年创新项目(S2024019)
评论