首页|期刊导航|水土保持学报|人工模拟降雨下高寒区坡面径流水动力特性对砾石覆盖的响应

人工模拟降雨下高寒区坡面径流水动力特性对砾石覆盖的响应OA

Response of Slope Runoff Hydrodynamic Characteristics to Gravel Coverage in Alpine Regions under Artificial Rainfall Simulation

中文摘要英文摘要

[目的]青藏高原地区地形复杂,砾石分布广泛,为研究该地区砾石覆盖与坡面径流水动力参数的关系,以揭示其对土壤侵蚀和生态环境保护的影响.[方法]通过室内人工模拟降雨试验,选取4种砾石覆盖度(0、20%、40%、60%)、3种砾石粒径(0.2~2、2~6、6~10 cm)对纯土坡面和土石混合坡面的径流水动力参数进行研究.[结果]1)在纯土坡面,流速随砾石覆盖度增加先减小后增大(依次为6.31、3.60、3.59、4.12 cm/s),砾石粒径为0.2~2 cm时,径流深随砾石覆盖度增加而增加(依次为0.42、0.51、0.84、1.03 mm),其他粒径相反;在土石混合坡面,流速随砾石覆盖度增加而减小(依次为5.23、5.07、5.26、3.83 cm/s),径流深变化趋势与纯土坡面一致.2)纯土坡面和土石混合坡面的雷诺数均<500,为层流;弗劳德数变化复杂,砾石覆盖度为40%且砾石粒径为2~6、6~10 cm时为急流,其他条件为缓流.3)在纯土坡面,砾石粒径为0.2~2 cm时,阻力系数随砾石覆盖度增加而增加(依次为0.02、0.02、0.03、0.04),其他粒径相反,曼宁糙率系数随砾石覆盖度增加先增大后减小(依次为0.02、0.06、0.07、0.06);在土石混合坡面,阻力系数变化趋势与纯土坡面一致,砾石粒径为 0.2~2 cm时,曼宁糙率系数随砾石覆盖度增加而增加(依次为 0.03、0.04、0.13、0.17),其他粒径时相反.4)在纯土坡面,砾石粒径为0.2~2 cm时,水流剪切力随砾石覆盖度增加而增加(依次为1.93、2.34、3.85、4.69 Pa),其他粒径相反,水流功率随砾石覆盖度增加先减小后增大[依次为0.12、0.08、0.07、0.10 N/(m·s)];在土石混合坡面,水流剪切力变化趋势与纯土坡面一致,砾石粒径为0.2~2、2~6 cm时,水流功率随砾石覆盖度增加先增大后减小[依次为0.11、0.13、0.10、0.08 N/(m·s)],粒径为6~10 cm时,水流功率随砾石覆盖度增加先减小后增大[依次为0.11、0.09、0.10、0.11 N/(m·s)].[结论]表层砾石覆盖、土体内部砾石和砾石粒径大小对水动力参数有着不同的调控机制.建议纯土坡面和土石混合坡面的砾石配置分别为小粒径(0.2~2 cm)和中覆盖度(40%)、小粒径(0.2~2 cm)和高覆盖度(60%),以期为该地区土壤侵蚀规律及水土流失防控提供支撑.

[Objective]The Tibetan Plateau has complex terrain and extensive gravel distribution.This study aims to investigate the relationship between gravel coverage and hydrodynamic parameters of slope runoff in the region,and to reveal its impact on soil erosion and ecological environment protection.[Methods]Laboratory artificial rainfall experiments were conducted to study the hydrodynamic parameters of runoff on bare soil slopes and soil-gravel mixed slopes,using four gravel coverage levels(0,20%,40%,60%)and three gravel size ranges(0.2-2,2-6,6-10 cm).[Results]1)On bare soil slopes,flow velocity initially decreased and then increased with increasing gravel coverage(6.31,3.60,3.59,4.12 cm/s).When the gravel size was 0.2-2 cm,runoff depth increased with gravel coverage(0.42,0.51,0.84,1.03 mm),while the opposite occurs for other particle sizes.On soil-gravel mixed slopes,flow velocity decreased with increasing gravel coverage(5.23,5.07,5.26,3.83 cm/s),and the trend of runoff depth was consistent with that on bare soil slopes.2)The Reynolds numbers for both bare soil slopes and soil-gravel mixed slopes were below 500,indicating laminar flow.The Froude numbers showed complex variation.With gravel coverage of 40%and gravel sizes of 2-6,6-10 cm,the flow was rapid.Under other conditions,it was tranquil.3)On bare soil slopes,when the gravel size was 0.2-2 cm,the resistance coefficient increased with gravel coverage(0.02,0.02,0.03,0.04),while showing inverse trends for other sizes.The Manning roughness coefficient first increased and then decreased with gravel coverage(0.02,0.06,0.07,0.06).On soil-gravel mixed slopes,the variation trend of resistance coefficient remained consistent with that on bare soil slopes.For gravel sizes of 0.2-2 cm,the Manning roughness coefficient increased with gravel coverage(0.03,0.04,0.13,0.17),while the opposite trend was observed for other sizes.4)On bare soil slopes,when the gravel size was 0.2-2 cm,shear stress increased with gravel coverage(1.93,2.34,3.85,4.69 Pa),while exhibiting opposite trend for other sizes.Stream power first decreased then increased with gravel coverage[0.12,0.08,0.07,0.10 N/(m·s)].On soil-gravel mixed slopes,the variation trend of shear stress was consistent with that on bare soil slopes.For gravel sizes of 0.2-2 and 2-6 cm,stream power first increased then decreased with gravel coverage[0.11,0.13,0.10,0.08 N/(m·s)].For gravel sizes of 6-10 cm,stream power first decreased and then increased[0.11,0.09,0.10,0.11 N/(m·s)].[Conclusion]Surface gravel coverage,internal gravel content,and gravel size have different regulatory effects on hydrodynamic parameters.It is recommended that bare soil slopes adopt a configuration of small gravel sizes(0.2-2 cm)with medium cover(40%),and soil-gravel mixed slopes use small gravel sizes with high cover(60%).This study provides support for understanding soil erosion patterns and preventing soil and water loss in the region.

陈亦新;杨波;李建军;李萌萌;王颢霖;章志鑫;焦菊英;林红;廖俊;严增;徐倩;张子琦

西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,陕西 杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100||山西农业大学水土保持科学研究所,太原 030013西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100||中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,陕西 杨凌 712100西藏自治区错那市自然资源局,西藏 错那 856700西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100||山西农业大学水土保持科学研究所,太原 030013西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院(水土保持研究所),水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室,陕西 杨凌 712100

农业科技

青藏高原模拟降雨砾石覆盖水动力参数土壤侵蚀

Tibetan Plateausimulated rainfallgravel coveragehydrodynamic parameterssoil erosion

《水土保持学报》 2026 (1)

56-66,77,12

国家自然科学基金重点项目(42430506)第二次青藏高原综合考察研究专题项目(2019QZKK0603)

10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.01.002

评论