首页|期刊导航|临床误诊误治|主动脉夹层误诊为急性心肌梗死临床分析

主动脉夹层误诊为急性心肌梗死临床分析OA

Clinical analysis of misdiagnosis of aortic dissection as acute myocardial infarction

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 分析主动脉夹层误诊为急性心肌梗死的原因,总结纠正误诊方法,以提高临床医师诊治水平.方法 回顾分析2020年6月至2023年6月收治的2例主动脉夹层误诊为急性心肌梗死患者的临床资料.结果 1例因胸痛伴呕吐3 h就诊,根据临床症状、入院查体及心电图检查显示窦性心律、胸导联T波改变(V3~V4低平、V5~V6浅倒置),初诊考虑急性心肌梗死及高血压病3级(极高危)予对症治疗.治疗第2天患者胸痛突然加剧难以忍受,再次行心电图检查、实验室检查、主动脉CT血管成像检查,最终诊断为降主动脉夹层DeBakey Ⅲ型,并伴有双侧胸腔积液.误诊时间24 h.内科对症治疗1周后病情缓解转外院行主动脉支架置入手术,手术顺利,患者恢复良好.1例因突发胸骨后撕裂样剧痛1 h就诊,根据临床症状、查体及床旁心电图结果诊断为急性下壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死,立即给予对症治疗.治疗期间进一步实验室检查,并组织专家会诊,家属拒绝行冠状动脉造影检查,签署知情同意书后给予静脉溶栓等治疗2 h,患者胸痛无明显缓解,再次行床旁全导心电图、床旁心脏超声、主动脉超声及主动脉增强CT检查,更正诊断为主动脉夹层(Stanford分型A型).误诊时间2 h.患者及家属拒绝转院手术治疗,经保守治疗14 d,患者病情好转出院.患者于出院后第7个月因心力衰竭抢救无效死亡.结论 主动脉夹层患者容易被误诊为急性心肌梗死,并因此给予不恰当治疗.临床医师应提高警惕,注意二者的鉴别要点,详细问诊及仔细查体,并尽早采取有针对性的影像学检查,以减少或避免主动脉夹层误诊误治.

Objective To analyze the reasons for misdiagnosis of aortic dissection as acute myocardial infarction(AMI),and to summarize the methods for correcting such misdiagnosis,so as to improve the diagnostic skills of clinical physicians.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 2 patients with aortic dissection who were misdiagnosed as having AMI from June 2020 to June 2023.Results One patient presented with chest pain and vomiting for 3 h.Based on the clinical symptoms,the physical examination upon admission,and the electrocardiogram(ECG)results indicating sinus rhythm with T-wave changes in the chest leads(flattened in V3-V4 and shallow inversion in V5-V6),the initial diagnosis was AMI and grade 3 hypertension(extremely high risk),and symptomatic treatment was given.On the second day of treatment,the patient's chest pain suddenly worsened to an unbearable level.Subsequently,ECG examination,laboratory tests,and a CT angiography of the aorta were performed,and the final diagnosis was descending aortic dissection of DeBakey type Ⅲ,accompanied by bilateral pleural effusion.The misdiagnosis lasted 24 h.After one week of internal medical treatment,the patient's condition improved and was transferred to another hospital for aortic stent-graft implantation.The operation was successful,and the patient recovered well.Another patient presented with a tearing-like severe pain behind the sternum for 1 h.Based on the clinical symptoms,physical examination,and bedside ECG results,the diagnosis was acute inferior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Symptomatic treatment was immediately administered.During the treatment period,further laboratory tests were conducted,and an expert consultation was organized.The family declined to undergo coronary angiography and signed an informed consent form.Intravenous thrombolysis was given for 2 h,but the patient's chest pain did not significantly relieve.Bedside full-channel ECG,bedside echocardiography,aortic ultrasound,and enhanced CT of the aorta were performed again to correct the diagnosis as aortic dissection(Stanford type A).The misdiagnosis lasted 2 h.The patient and the family declined to undergo surgical treatment at another hospital and received conservative treatment for 14 d.The patient's condition improved and was discharged.At seven months after discharge,the patient died due to ineffective rescue from heart failure.Conclusion Patients with aortic dissection are prone to misdiagnosis of AMI and receive inappropriate treatment accordingly.Clinicians should be vigilant,pay attention to the key points for differentiating the two conditions,conduct detailed inquiries and thorough physical examinations,and promptly carry out targeted imaging examinations to reduce or avoid misdiagnosis and mistreatment of aortic dissection.

贾亚婧;杜密稳;李翔华

国药同煤总医院心血管内科,山西 大同 037003国药同煤总医院心血管内科,山西 大同 037003国药同煤总医院心血管内科,山西 大同 037003

主动脉夹层误诊急性心肌梗死鉴别诊断心电图CT血管成像胸痛

aortic dissectionmisdiagnosisacute myocardial infarctiondifferential diagnosiselectrocardiogramsCT angiographychest pain

《临床误诊误治》 2026 (3)

7-13,7

10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2026.03.002

评论