矮小症儿童桡、尺、掌、指骨骨龄与腕骨骨龄特点及两种评分法对比OA
Characteristics of radius,ulna,metacarpal and phalangeal bone age and carpal bone age in children with short stature and comparison of two scoring methods
目的 研究矮小症儿童的骨龄特点,并将两种骨龄评分法在矮小症儿童中的评估结果进行对比,为临床对矮小症的诊治提供参考依据.方法 回顾收集3~12岁矮小症儿童的临床及左手X线影像资料,以生活年龄1岁为1组,男、女童各分为10组.对每例儿童均采用两种方法评估骨龄.应用统计学方法先对矮小症儿童生活年龄、TW-C R系列(桡骨、尺骨、掌、指骨)骨龄、TW-C C系列(腕骨)骨龄进行进行三者比较,再进行两两比较.结果 共纳入1 183例,其中男739例,女444例.3~7岁、9~12岁男童及3~8岁、10岁女童的生活年龄、TW-C R系列骨龄、TW-C C系列骨龄三者不全相等,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两两比较时,3岁、9~12岁男童及6~8岁、10岁女童的生活年龄均大于TW-C R系列骨龄(P<0.05),12岁男童、10岁女童的差值最大,分别达1.02、0.78岁;4~7岁、9~12岁男童及3~8岁、10岁女童的生活年龄均大于TW-C C系列骨龄(P<0.05),12岁男童、10岁女童的差值最大,分别达1.34、0.78岁.3岁、5~6岁男童及3~5岁女童的TW-C R系列与TW-C C系列骨龄差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),4岁、7~12岁男童及6~12岁女童的TW-C R系列与TW-C C系列骨龄差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 多数矮小症儿童骨龄小于生活年龄,年龄越大骨龄落后越显著,其中以TW-C C系列骨龄最明显.矮小症儿童个体化诊疗时,骨龄监测应侧重TW-C C系列.
Objective To investigate bone age characteristics in children with short stature and to compare the assessment results of two bone age scoring methods,providing reference for clinical diagnosis and management.Methods Clinical data and left-hand X-ray images of children aged 3-12 years with short stature were retrospectively collect-ed.Children were stratified by chronological age(1-year intervals)and sex.Bone age was assessed using two methods:TW-C R series(radius,ulna,metacarpal and phalangeal bones)and TW-C C series(carpal bones).Statistical com-parisons were performed among chronological age,TW-C R bone age,and TW-C C bone age,and pairwise compari-sons were conducted.Results A total of 1,183 children were included(739 boys,444 girls).For boys aged 3-7 and 9-12 years and girls aged 3-8 and 10 years,chronological age,TW-C R bone age,and TW-C C bone age were not equal,with significant differences(P<0.05).Pairwise comparisons showed that chronological age exceeded TW-C R bone age in boys aged 3,9-12 and girls aged 6-8,10 years(P<0.05),with the largest difference at 12 years for boys(1.02 years)and 10 years for girls(0.78 years).Chronological age also exceeded TW-C C bone age in boys aged 4-7,9-12 and girls aged 3-8,10 years(P<0.05),with the largest difference at 12 years for boys(1.34 years)and 10 years for girls(0.78 years).TW-C R and TW-C C bone ages differed significantly in boys aged 3,5-6 and girls aged 3-5 years(P<0.05),but showed no significant difference in older age groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Most chil-dren with short stature have bone ages below their chronological age,with greater delays in older children,especially evi-dent in TW-C C series.Individualized management of short stature should prioritize monitoring TW-C C series bone age.
黄华驰;黄卫保;车锦连;林剑军;王映飞;梁志凌
广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院放射科(广西南宁 530000)广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院放射科(广西南宁 530000)广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院放射科(广西南宁 530000)广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院放射科(广西南宁 530000)广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院放射科(广西南宁 530000)广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院放射科(广西南宁 530000)
医药卫生
矮小症儿童骨龄骨龄评分法
dwarfismchildrenbone agebone age scoring method
《广东医学》 2026 (1)
34-38,5
广西科技计划项目(2025FNFW96346)广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会计划课题(Z20200646)
评论