首页|期刊导航|中国输血杂志|肝移植术中RhE抗原匹配输血对患者早期预后的影响分析

肝移植术中RhE抗原匹配输血对患者早期预后的影响分析OA

Analysis of the impact of intraoperative RhE antigen-matched transfusion on early prognosis in liver transplant pa-tients

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨肝移植术RhE抗原匹配输血对患者术后早期恢复及并发症的影响.方法 采用回顾性队列研究设计,选择 2022 年 1 月至 2025 年 7 月在昆明市第一人民医院接受肝移植手术的 95 例患者为研究对象.将患者分为 2 组:RHE不匹配输血组(n=57)和RHE匹配输血组(n=38),比较 2 组患者基线资料、术后d1、d3、d5、d7、d10 的血常规、肝肾功能、凝血功能及并发症发生率.采用KAPLAN-MEIER法进行生存分析.结果 2 组患者基线资料均衡可比(均P>0.05).不匹配组术后早期死亡率(31.58%,18/57)高于匹配组(10.53%,4/38),差异具有统计学意义(P=0.017).不匹配组术后肝性脑病发病率(50.88%,29/57)高于匹配组(10.53%,4/38),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001).不匹配组术后出血发生率(24.56%,14/57)高于匹配组(5.26%,2/38),差异具有统计学意义(P=0.014).不匹配组围术期感染发生率(28.07%,16/57)高于匹配组(10.53%,4/38),差异具有统计学意义(P=0.04).对应的OR值及 95%置信区间提示匹配组上述不良事件发生风险更低.术后D1,不匹配组活化部分凝血酶时间变化量(-1.6,20.5)高于匹配组(-0.2,5.5),不匹配组国际标准化比值变化量(-0.56,1.22)高于匹配组(-0.18,0.32),不匹配组白蛋白变化量(-4,4.8)低于匹配组(-2.5,8.8).术后 d5,不匹配组白蛋白变化量(-0.41±7.83)低于匹配组(2.68±4.53).术后 d7,不匹配组白蛋白变化量(-0.61±7.38)低于匹配组(2.51±5.85),不匹配组D-二聚体变化量(0.73,7.4)高于匹配组(-1.6,4.3).术后D10,不匹配组纤维蛋白原(-1.21,1.78)高于匹配组(-0.49,0.97),不匹配组凝血酶原时间(-11.3,-2.7)高于匹配组(-6.2,-0.8),具有统计学意义(均P<0.05).匹配组OS均值为 32.803 个月(95%CI:29.171~36.436),显著高于不匹配组的 28.996 个月(95%CI:24.202~33.790),LOG-RANK检验结果具有统计学意义(χ2=4.307,P=0.038).结论 在肝移植术中实施RhE抗原匹配输血,可能有助于降低患者术后早期死亡率和主要并发症发生率,促进凝血功能与肝功能更快恢复,改善患者短期预后.

Objective To investigate the impact of RhE antigen-matched transfusion during liver transplantation on ear-ly postoperative recovery and complications.Methods In this retrospective cohort study,ninety-five patients undergoing liver transplantation at Kunming First People's Hospital between January 2022 and July 2025 were enrolled.Patients were divided into two groups:Group 1(RhE-mismatched transfusion,n=57)and Group 2(RhE-matched transfusion,n=38).The baseline data,complete blood counts,hepatic and renal function,coagulation parameters,and complication rates be-tween the two groups were compared at postoperative days 1,3,5,7,and 10.Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results The baseline characteristics were well-balanced and comparable between the two groups(all P>0.05).The early postoperative mortality rate in the mismatched group(31.58%,18/57)was significantly higher than that in the matched group(10.53%,4/38)(P=0.017).The incidence of postoperative hepatic encephalopathy was significantly higher in the mismatched group(50.88%,29/57)than in the matched group(10.53%,4/38)(P<0.001).The incidence of postoperative haemorrhage in the mismatched group(24.56%,14/57)was higher than that in the matched group(5.26%,2/38),with a statistically significant difference(P=0.014).The incidence of perioperative in-fection in the mismatched group(28.07%,16/57)was higher than that in the matched group(10.53%,4/38),with a statistically significant difference(P=0.04).Corresponding odds ratios(OR)and 95%confidence intervals indicated a lower risk of these adverse events in the matched group.On postoperative day 1,the change in activated partial thrombo-plastin time(-1.6,20.5)in the mismatched group was greater than in the matched group(-0.2,5.5).The change in international normalised ratio(-0.56,1.22)in the mismatched group was greater than in the matched group(-0.18,0.32),while the change in albumin(-4.0,4.8)was smaller in the mismatched group than in the matched group(-2.5,8.8).On postoperative day 5,the change in albumin(-0.41±7.83)in the mismatched group was smaller than in the matched group(2.68±4.53).At postoperative day 7,the change in albumin in the mismatched group(-0.61±7.38)was smaller than that in the matched group(2.51±5.85),while the change in D-dimer in the mismatched group(0.73,7.4)was greater than that in the matched group(-1.6,4.3).On postoperative day 10,the mismatched group exhibited signifi-cantly higher fibrinogen levels(-1.21,1.78)than the matched group(-0.49,0.97),and significantly longer prothrom-bin times(-11.3,-2.7)than the matched group(-6.2,-0.8)(all P<0.05).The matched group exhibited a mean o-verall survival(OS)of 32.803 months(95%CI:29.171-36.436 months),significantly exceeding the mismatched group's 28.996 months(95%CI:24.202-33.790 months).The log-rank test yielded statistically significant results(χ2=4.307,P=0.038).Conclusion Implementing RhE blood group-matched transfusion during liver transplan-tation may help reduce early postoperative mortality and the incidence of major complication rates,pro-mote faster recovery of coagulation and liver function,and thereby improve short-term patient outcomes.

于晓超;徐荣华;高鑫源;海帆;杨超;侯星羽;邢亚萍;高红强;张鸿伟;苏纲

昆明医科大学附属甘美医院 输血科,云南 昆明 650000昆明市第一人民医院 输血科,云南 昆明 650000昆明医科大学附属甘美医院 输血科,云南 昆明 650000昆明市第一人民医院 输血科,云南 昆明 650000昆明市第一人民医院 输血科,云南 昆明 650000昆明市第一人民医院 输血科,云南 昆明 650000昆明市第一人民医院 输血科,云南 昆明 650000昆明市第一人民医院 肝胆外科,云南 昆明 650000昆明市第一人民医院 检验科,云南 昆明 650000昆明市第一人民医院 麻醉科,云南 昆明 650000

医药卫生

Rh血型E抗原输血肝功能

Rh blood groupE antigenblood transfusionliver function

《中国输血杂志》 2026 (1)

44-50,68,8

昆明市卫生健康委员会卫生科研课题项目(2023-04-10-001)昆明市医学科技学科后备人才(千工程)[2024-sw(后备)-14]

10.13303/j.cjbt.issn.1004-549x.2026.01.006

评论