首页|期刊导航|中国药业|基于高效液相色谱多指标成分分析的化学计量学评价补气养血颗粒质量

基于高效液相色谱多指标成分分析的化学计量学评价补气养血颗粒质量OA

Quality Evaluation of Buqi Yangxue Granules Based on HPLC Multi-Index Components Combined with Chemometrics

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 建立同时测定补气养血颗粒中14种成分含量的高效液相色谱法,并评价其质量.方法 色谱柱为Prep Scalar C18柱(250 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm),流动相为乙腈-0.2%磷酸溶液(梯度洗脱),流速为 1.0 mL/min,检测波长分别为 230 nm(芍药内酯苷、芍药苷、苯甲酰芍药苷)、210 nm(梓醇、地黄苷D、人参皂苷Rg1、人参皂苷Re、人参皂苷Rb1)、260 nm(毛蕊异黄酮葡萄糖苷、芒柄花苷、黄芪紫檀烷苷)、280 nm(洋川芎内酯H、洋川芎内酯I、洋川芎内酯A),柱温为 30℃,进样量为 10 μL.采用主成分分析(PCA)法和正交偏最小二乘法-判别分析(OPLS-DA)法筛选差异标志物,并采用加权逼近理想解排序(TOPSIS)法评价样品质量.结果 上述 14 种成分在各自质量浓度范围内与峰面积线性关系良好(r≥0.999 1,n=6);精密度、稳定性、重复性试验结果的RSD均小于 2%;回收率为 96.83%~100.18%,RSD 为 0.69%~1.82%(n=9).18 批样品中上述 14 种成分的含量分别为 0.370~0.630 mg/g、0.630~1.080 mg/g、0.045~0.089 mg/g、0.260~0.500 mg/g、0.070~0.150 mg/g、0.150~0.260 mg/g、0.300~0.520 mg/g、0.150~0.440 mg/g、0.075~0.270 mg/g、0.060~0.101 mg/g、0.021~0.037 mg/g、0.035~0.059 mg/g、0.079~0.160 mg/g、0.220~0.380 mg/g.PCA和OPLS-DA结果显示,18 批样品聚为 3 类,芍药苷、洋川芎内酯I、人参皂苷Rb1、地黄苷D、梓醇、芍药内酯苷、人参皂苷Re、毛蕊异黄酮葡萄糖苷是影响样品质量的差异标志物.18 批样品的相对贴近度(Ci)为 0.3210~0.7342,其中 6 批样品的Ci>0.5.结论 该方法操作简便,结果科学、直观,可用于补气养血颗粒质量的综合评价.不同批次样品的质量存在一定差异.

Objective To establish a high-performance liquid chromatography(HPLC)method for the simultaneous determination of 14 components in Buqi Yangxue Granules,and to evaluate its quality.Methods The chromatographic column was Prep Scalar C18 column(250 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm),the mobile phase was acetonitrile-0.2%phosphoric acid solution(gradient elution),the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min,the detection wavelengths were 230 nm(albiflorin,paeoniflorin,benzoylpaeoniflorin),210 nm(catalpol,rehmannioside D,ginsenoside Rg1,ginsenoside Re,ginsenoside Rb1),260 nm(calycosin 7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside,ononin,isomucronulatol 7-O-β-glucoside),and 280 nm(senkyunolide H,senkyunolide I,senkyunolide A),the column temperature was 30℃,and the injection volume was 10 μL.Principal component analysis(PCA)and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis(OPLS-DA)were used to screen differential markers,and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)method was used to evaluate sample quality.Results The above 14 components had good linear relationships with peak area within their respective mass concentration ranges(r≥0.999 1,n=6).The RSDs of precision,stability,and repeatability tests were all lower than 2%.The recovery rate of the above 14 components in the range of 96.83%-100.18%,with RSDs of 0.69%-1.82%(n=9).The contents of the above 14 components in 18 batches of samples were in the ranges of 0.370-0.630 mg/g,0.630-1.080 mg/g,0.045-0.089 mg/g,0.260-0.500 mg/g,0.070-0.150 mg/g,0.150-0.260 mg/g,0.300-0.520 mg/g,0.150-0.440 mg/g,0.075-0.270 mg/g,0.060-0.101 mg/g,0.021-0.037 mg/g,0.035-0.059 mg/g,0.079-0.160 mg/g,and 0.220-0.380 mg/g,respectively.PCA and OPLS-DA results indicated that the 18 batches of samples were clustered into three categories.Paeoniflorin,senkyunolide I,ginsenoside Rb1,rehmannioside D,catalpol,albiflorin,ginsenoside Re,and calycosin 7-O-β-D-glucopyranoside were identified as differential markers affecting sample quality.The relative closeness index(Ci)of the 18 batches of samples ranged from 0.321 0 to 0.734 2,with Ci>0.5 for six batches of samples.Conclusion The method is simple,scientific and intuitive,and can be used for the comprehensive evaluation of the quality of Buqi Yangxue Granules.There are some differences in the quality of samples from different batches.

陈瑱;魏谭军;陈飞;王春龙;魏旭;赵圣艳

四川省达州市中西医结合医院·四川省达州市第二人民医院,四川 达州 635000四川省达州市中西医结合医院·四川省达州市第二人民医院,四川 达州 635000四川省达州市中西医结合医院·四川省达州市第二人民医院,四川 达州 635000四川省达州市中西医结合医院·四川省达州市第二人民医院,四川 达州 635000四川省达州市中西医结合医院·四川省达州市第二人民医院,四川 达州 635000达州中医药职业学院,四川 达州 635000

医药卫生

补气养血颗粒高效液相色谱法主成分分析正交偏最小二乘法-判别分析加权逼近理想解排序质量评价

Buqi Yangxue GranulesHPLCprincipal component analysisorthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysisTOPSIS methodquality evaluation

《中国药业》 2026 (3)

85-90,6

四川省中医药管理局中医药科研专项课题[2024MS040]四川省财政厅、四川省科学技术厅中央引导地方科技发展资金专项项目[2023ZYD0283].

10.3969/j.issn.1006-4931.2026.03.016

评论