染色体微阵列联合全外显子测序技术在胎儿生长受限产前诊断中的应用价值OA
The application value of chromosome microarray combined with whole exome sequencing in prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction
目的 探讨染色体微阵列(CMA)联合全外显子测序技术(WES)在胎儿生长受限(FGR)产前诊断中的临床应用价值.方法 选取2022年1月至2025年4月于北部战区总医院就诊并行介入性产前诊断的47例FGR胎儿,根据首次诊断时的胎龄分为<28周组(n=24)和28~31+6周组(n=23),根据是否合并其他超声异常分为单纯FGR组(n=32)和FGR合并其他超声异常组(n=15).所有病例同时行CMA及WES检测,分析产前诊断结果并比较不同分组下的遗传学异常检出率.结果 (1)总体检出率:CMA检出染色体异常9例,其中致病性拷贝数变异(CNV)5例、临床意义未明4例;WES检出基因变异19例,其中致病性/可疑致病性(P/LP)变异11例、临床意义未明变异8例(8例中具有不完全外显基因变异3例).CMA检出的所有致病性CNV均被WES同时检出,但临床意义未明的CNV未被WES检出.WES异常检出率显著高于CMA(P<0.05),但与CMA联合检测的异常检出率相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).(2)胎龄分组比较:在<28周组FGR病例中,P/LP变异检出率显著高于28~31+6周组(P<0.05).(3)FGR类型分组比较:在FGR合并其他超声异常组中,遗传学异常检出率和P/LP变异检出率均显著高于单纯型FGR组(P<0.05).结论 明确诊断的FGR胎儿进行CMA和WES检测,可提高其致病性/可疑致病性遗传变异检出率.对于临床诊断FGR病例,若孕周<28周和(或)合并超声结构异常,建议首选CMA检测,若CMA结果为阴性建议补充WES检测;28~31+6周FGR胎儿,建议首选CMA与WES联合检测,若存在显著经济限制,可单独选择WES检测.
Objectives:To exploring the application value of combining chromosomal microarray analysis(CMA)with whole exome sequencing(WES)in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction(FGR). Methods:A total of 47 fetuses with FGR who underwent interventional prenatal diagnosis at the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command between January 2022 and April 2025 were selected.Cases were stratified by the gestational age at initial diagnosis into the group<28 weeks(n=24)and one between 28 to 31+6 weeks(n=23).Further classification was based on the presence of additional ultrasound abnormalities:isolated FGR(n=32)and FGR with other ultrasound abnormalities(n=15).All cases underwent concurrent CM A and WES testing.Prenatal diagnosis outcomes were analyzed,and genetic abnormality detection rates across groups were compared. Results:As for the overall detection rates,CM A detected chromosomal abnormalities in 9 cases,including 5 pathogenic copy number variations(CNVs)and 4 of unknown clinical significance.WES identified genetic variations in 19 cases,comprising 11 pathogenic/probably pathogenic(P/LP)variations and 8 of unknown clinical significance with 3 of the latter exhibiting incomplete penetrance.Pathogenic CNVs detected by CMA were concurrently identified by WES,whereas WES failed to detect clinically ambiguous CNVs identified by CMA.The WES abnormality detection rate was significantly higher than that of CMA(P<0.05),but showed no statistically significant difference compared to the combined CMA-WES detection rate(P>0.05).Regarding the comparison by gestational age group,the detection rate of P/LP variation in the group<28 weeks was significantly higher than that in the group between 28 to 31+6 weeks(P<0.05).As for the comparison by FGR subtype,both the detection rate of genetic abnormalities and the detection rate of P/LP variation in the group with FGR combined with other ultrasound abnormalities were significantly higher than those in the isolated FGR group(P<0.05). Conclusions:Performing CMA and WES on fetuses with a confirmed diagnosis of FGR can increase the detection rate of pathogenic/suspected pathogenic genetic variants.For clinically diagnosed FGR cases,if gestational age is less than 28 weeks and/or accompanied by ultrasound structural abnormalities,CM A is recommended as the primary test.If CMA results are negative,WES is recommended as a supplement.For fetuses with FGR between 28 and 31+6 weeks gestation,combined CMA and WES testing is recommended as the primary approach.If significant financial constraints exist,WES testing alone may be selected.
刘婷艾;闫靖奇;陈震宇
北部战区总医院和平院区妇产科,沈阳 110000锦州医科大学北部战区总医院研究生培养基地,沈阳 110000北部战区总医院和平院区妇产科,沈阳 110000
医药卫生
胎儿生长受限产前诊断染色体微阵列分析全外显子测序遗传咨询
Fetal growth restrictionPrenatal diagnosisChromosome microarray analysisWhole exome sequencingGenetic counseling
《生殖医学杂志》 2026 (1)
48-57,10
2022年沈阳市科技计划公共卫生研发专项(22-321-33-31)
评论