首页|期刊导航|生殖医学杂志|首次冻融胚胎移植周期中移植单囊胚与双卵裂胚的临床结局比较

首次冻融胚胎移植周期中移植单囊胚与双卵裂胚的临床结局比较OA

Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes of single blastocyst and double blastocyst transfer during the first freeze-thaw embryo cycle

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 探讨在首次冻融胚胎移植(FET)周期中移植1枚囊胚与移植2枚卵裂胚对妊娠结局的影响,以期为临床实践中移植不同类型胚胎的选择提供更多参考.方法 回顾性分析2016年1月至2024年5月在厦门大学附属妇女儿童医院生殖医学科行首次FET助孕、20~<40岁患者的3 379个周期的临床资料.按照年龄不同分为适龄组(20~<35岁,n=2 801)及高龄组(35~<40岁,n=578),每组又根据移植不同类型胚胎分为3个亚组:双卵裂胚组(移植受精后第3天的两枚卵裂胚,包括1枚优质卵裂胚和1枚非优质卵裂胚)、单优囊胚组(移植1枚优质囊胚)和单非优囊胚组(移植1枚非优质囊胚).比较不同年龄组中不同亚组的妊娠结局及单胎出生子代情况.结果 (1)适龄组中,单优囊胚组的临床妊娠率、活产率、早期流产率与双卵裂胚组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),单优囊胚组的多胎妊娠率(1.9%vs.35.0%)、异位妊娠率(0.9%vs.2.5%)显著低于双卵裂胚组(P<0.05),单优囊胚组的男婴出生率(61.4%vs.52.0%)显著高于双卵裂胚组(P=0.021),而组间早产率、畸形儿出生率、低出生体重儿率、巨大儿率与双卵裂胚组比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05);单非优囊胚组的临床妊娠率(53.5%vs.68.2%)、活产率(42.7%vs.59.7%)、多胎妊娠率(2.4%vs.35.0%)、异位妊娠率(0.5%vs.2.5%)均显著低于双卵裂胚组(P<0.05),但单非优囊胚组的早产率、男婴出生率、畸形儿出生率、低出生体重儿率及巨大儿率与双卵裂胚组比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05).(2)高龄组中,单优囊胚组的临床妊娠率、活产率、早期流产率、异位妊娠率与双卵裂胚组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),多胎妊娠率(3.9%vs.21.1%)显著低于双卵裂胚组(P<0.001);单非优囊胚组的临床妊娠率(42.2%vs.60.3%)、活产率(33.3%vs.48.4%)、多胎妊娠率(2.3%vs.21.1%)显著低于双卵裂胚组(P均<0.001);单优囊胚组、单非优囊胚组与双卵裂胚组比较,早产率、男婴出生率、畸生儿出生率、低出生体重儿率、巨大儿率均无显著性差异(P>0.05).结论 首次FET周期中,可优先考虑单优质囊胚移植;若无优质囊胚,在患者无双胎妊娠禁忌的情况下可考虑移植1枚优质卵裂胚和1枚非优质卵裂胚.

Objectives:To investigate the effects of transferring one blastocyst and two cleavage stage embryos during freeze-thaw embryo cycle on pregnancy outcomes,and to provide more references for the selection of different types of embryos in clinical practice. Methods:The clinical data of 3 379 cycles of patients aged 20 to less than 40 years who underwent frozen embryo transfer(FET)in the Department of Reproductive Medicine,Women and Children's Hospital of Xiamen University from January 2016 to May 2024 were retrospectively analyzed,and the patients were divided into appropriate age group(20 to less than 35 years,n=2 801)and advanced age group(35 to less than 40 years,n=578)according to their age.Patients in each group were further divided into three subgroups according to different types of embryos transferred:double cleavage embryos group(two cleavage embryos transferred on the third day after fertilization,including one high-quality cleavage embryo and one non-high-quality cleavage embryo),single excellent blastocyst group(one high-quality blastocyst transferred)and single non-excellent blastocyst group(one non-high-quality blastocyst transferred). Results:There were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate,live birth rate and early abortion rate between the single blastocyst group and the double cleavage group(P>0.05).The multiple pregnancy rate(1.9%vs.35.0%)and ectopic pregnancy rate(0.9%vs.2.5%)in the single excellent blastocyst group were significantly lower than those in the double cleavage group(P<0.05),and the male birth rate(61.4%vs.52.0%)in the single excellent blastocyst group was significantly higher than that in the double cleavage group(P=0.021).There were no significant differences in the rates of premature delivery,birth deformity,low birth weight and macrosomia between the two groups(P>0.05).The clinical pregnancy rate(53.5%vs.68.2%),live birth rate(42.7%vs.59.7%),multiple pregnancy rate(2.4%vs.35.0%)and ectopic pregnancy rate(0.5%vs.2.5%)in the single non-excellent blastocyst group were significantly lower than those of the double cleavage group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the rates of premature birth,male birth,birth deformity,low birth weight and macrosomia between the double cleavage group and the single non-excellent blastocyst group(P>0.05).As for advanced age group,there were no significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate,live birth rate,early abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate between the double cleavage group and single excellent blastocyst group(P>0.05),but the multiple pregnancy rate in the single excellent blastocyst group(3.9%vs.21.1%)was significantly lower than that of the double cleavage group(P<0.001).The clinical pregnancy rate(42.2%vs.60.3%),live birth rate(33.3%vs.48.4%)and the multiple pregnancy rate(2.3%vs.21.1%)in the single non-excellent blastocyst group were significantly lower than those of the double cleavage group(P all<0.001).There were no significant differences in the rates of premature birth,male birth,birth deformity,low birth weight and macrosomia among the single excellent blastocyst group,the single non-excellent blastocyst group and the double cleavage group(P>0.05). Conclusions:In the first FET cycle,single high-quality blastocyst transfer is preferred.When there is no high-quality blastocyst,one high-quality cleavage embryo and one non-high-quality cleavage embryo can be transferred if the patient has no contraindication for twin pregnancy.

叶雅萍;黄惠;林津;李萍

厦门大学附属妇女儿童医院厦门市妇幼保健院生殖医学科,厦门 361000厦门市生殖与遗传重点实验室,厦门 361000厦门大学附属妇女儿童医院厦门市妇幼保健院生殖医学科,厦门 361000厦门市生殖与遗传重点实验室,厦门 361000

医药卫生

冻融胚胎移植单囊胚双卵裂期胚胎临床妊娠率活产率

Freeze-thaw embryoSingle blastocystDouble cleavage stage embryoClinical pregnancy rateLive birth rate

《生殖医学杂志》 2026 (1)

15-22,8

福建省自然科学基金(2023J011611)白求恩医学科学研究基金(QL002DS)

10.3969/j.issn.1004-3845.2026.01.003

评论