首页|期刊导航|三峡大学学报(自然科学版)|动水压力下隧道衬砌水压演变规律及防排水优化研究

动水压力下隧道衬砌水压演变规律及防排水优化研究OA

Water Pressure Evolution of Tunnel Lining under Hydrodynamic Pressure and Optimization of Waterproof and Drainage System

中文摘要英文摘要

为了探明地表强降雨时隧道衬砌背后的水压演变规律,并对现有排水方案进行优化设计,搭建了一套渗流模型试验系统,对半包半排和中心排水沟落底方案下衬砌的水压演变规律进行了试验研究;进一步建立数值模型,对比分析了半包半排、环向排水管加密、中心排水沟落底3种方案的排水效果,并比选出适用于富水隧道的最优方案.结果表明:半包半排方案下,隧道衬砌水压力随水头高度增加而增加,仰拱水压无法通过排水系统有效降低,水压分布呈拱部小、仰拱大的"蘑菇状";环向排水管加密方案下,隧道拱墙区域的水压力显著降低,但仰拱区域仍维持着高水压力,使仰拱结构受力进一步劣化.中心排水沟落底方案下,隧道拱部和仰拱区域水压力均大幅度降低,衬砌达到安全(破坏)临界状态所能承受的水头高度为105m(253m),抗水压能力是半包半排方案的5(7.6)倍.在富水山岭隧道结构设计时,建议采用中心排水沟落底的排水结构型式.

In order to explore the evolution law of water pressure behind the tunnel lining during the surface strong rainfall,and optimize the existing drainage scheme,a set of seepage model test system was built,and the evolution law of water pressure of the lining under the schemes of half covering and half draining and the bottom falling of the central drainage ditch was experimentally studied.A numerical model was further established to compare and analyze the drainage effects of three schemes,namely,half wrapped and half drained,circular drainage pipe densification and central drainage ditch bottom falling,and the optimal scheme for water-rich tunnels was selected.The results show that:under the scheme of half covering and half draining,the water pressure of tunnel lining increases with the increase of water head,the inverted arch water pressure cannot be effectively reduced through the drainage system,and the water pressure distribution is"mushroom"with small arch and large inverted arch.Under the circular drainage pipe densification scheme,the water pressure in the tunnel arch wall area is significantly reduced,but the inverted arch area still maintains high water pressure,which further degrades the stress of the inverted arch structure.Under the scheme of the central drainage ditch falling to the bottom,the water pressure in the arch and invert areas of the tunnel is greatly reduced,the water head of the lining resisting at the critical state of safety and failure is 105m and 253m respectively.The water pressure resistance capacity is 5(7.6)times of the scheme of half covering and half draining.In the structural design of water-rich mountain tunnel,it is suggested to adopt the drainage structure type of central drainage ditch falling to the bottom.

任凡凡;吴庆成;徐强;王吉;樊浩博

石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,石家庄 050043中国铁路设计集团有限公司,天津 300308淮阴工学院 交通工程学院,江苏 淮安 223003石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,石家庄 050043石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,石家庄 050043

交通工程

富水隧道衬砌模型试验水压力防排水优化

water-rich tunnelsliningmodel testwater pressureoptimization of waterproof and drainage

《三峡大学学报(自然科学版)》 2026 (1)

8-16,23,10

国家自然科学基金项目(52108378,72271170)青年人才托举工程项目(2021QNRC001)河北省高等学校科学技术研究项目(BJK2023079)

10.13393/j.cnki.issn.1672-948X.2026.01.002

评论