植被恢复力的概念解析及评估方法述评OA
Review on the conceptual analysis of vegetation resilience and its assessment methods
植被恢复力评估是生态恢复的科学基础,其评估结果关系到生态修复工程的决策.采用客观准确的评估方法既可精准捕捉植被恢复动态,又能为生态修复规划提供量化决策支持.本文以外在干扰下的植被恢复力为研究对象,从植被恢复力的内涵解析入手,分析不同数据集在植被恢复力评估中的适用范围及其优缺点,并分别评述了两类干扰情景下(脉冲型干扰和持续型干扰)的植被恢复力评估方法,进一步比较分析了各种方法的优缺点及适用性;最后,在上述分析的基础上构建情景相关的植被恢复力评估方法对比体系,为未来的植被恢复力评估及生态保护措施的制定奠定基础.
As the scientific basis for understanding ecological restoration,the assessment of vegetation resilience provides critical insights that inform decision-making in ecological restoration projects.The use of objective and accurate assessment methods can accurately capture the dynamics of vegetation restoration and provide quantitative decision support for ecological restoration planning.This study focused on vegetation resilience in the context of external perturbations.We analyzed the connotation of vegetation resilience,explored the applicability of different datasets for assessing resilience,and compared the advantages and disadvantages.Furthermore,we reviewed the assessment methods of vegetation resilience under two types of perturbation scenarios:pulse perturbations and press perturbations,and analyzed the advantages,disadvantages,and applicability of these methods in a comparative approach.Finally,a scenario-relevant comparative system for vegetation resilience assessment methods was con-structed,laying a foundation for future vegetation resilience assessment and the formulation of ecological protection measures.
李佳旭;康濒月;宁园力;张秦泽;李洪远
南开大学环境科学与工程学院,天津 300350南开大学环境科学与工程学院,天津 300350南开大学环境科学与工程学院,天津 300350北京大学城市与环境学院,北京 100871南开大学环境科学与工程学院,天津 300350
恢复力脉冲型干扰持续型干扰量化评估稳定性
resiliencepulse perturbationpress perturbationquantitative evaluationstability
《生态学杂志》 2026 (1)
292-304,13
国家自然科学基金项目(32171853)资助.
评论