瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚分别复合低剂量艾司氯胺酮麻醉对宫腔镜手术患者血流动力学、应激反应的影响OA
Effects of Remazolam versus Propofol combined with low-dose Esketamine anesthesia on hemodynamics and stress response in patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery
目的 比较丙泊酚与瑞马唑仑分别复合低剂量艾司氯胺酮麻醉对宫腔镜手术患者血流动力学、应激反应的影响.方法 前瞻性选取2022年10月至2023年10月收治的140例宫腔镜手术患者,采用随机抽签法分为P组和R组各70例.P组诱导期采用艾司氯胺酮联合丙泊酚,R组诱导期采用艾司氯胺酮联合苯磺酸瑞马唑仑.比较两组麻醉诱导及术后唤醒时间,入室时(T0)、麻醉用药后2min(T1)、检查后(T2)、扩阴器退出(T3)、苏醒时(T4)血流动力学[收缩压、舒张压、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)、心率],术前、术后30 min应激反应指标[肾上腺素、皮质醇],苏醒期镇静、躁动程度[Ramsay镇静评分、苏醒期躁动评分(PEAD)]、苏醒期不良反应发生情况.结果 两组麻醉诱导时间、术后唤醒时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);T0、T1、T2、T3、T4时,两组收缩压、舒张压、SpO2、心率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后30 min,R组肾上腺素、皮质醇水平较P组降低(P<0.05);R组苏醒期Ramsay镇静评分与P组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),PAED评分低于P组(P<0.01);两组SpO2降低、恶心呕吐、嗜睡发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),R组躁动发生率低于P组(P<0.05).结论 瑞马唑仑复合低剂量艾司氯胺酮与丙泊酚复合低剂量艾司氯胺酮麻醉效果相当,均能稳定术中血流动力学,但前者更有利于减轻围术期应激反应,并降低苏醒期躁动发生率.
Objective To compare the effects of Propofol versus Remazolam combined with low-dose Esketamine anesthesia on hemodynamics and stress response in patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery.Methods A total of 140 patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery from October 2022 to October 2023 were prospectively selected and divided into group P(n=70)and group R(n=70)using a sealed-envelope method.Group P was treated with Esketamine combined with Propofol during the induction period,and group R was treated with Esketamine combined with Remazolam during the induction period.The duration of anesthesia induction and time to postoperative emergence,hemodynamic parameters[systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),pulse oxygen saturation(SpO2),heart rate]upon entering the room(T0),at 2 min after anesthetic administration(T1),after examination(T2),after vaginal dilator withdrawal(T3),and at emergence(T4),stress response indicators[adrenaline,cortisol]before operation and at 30 m after operation,degree of sedation and agitation during the recovery period[Ramsay sedation scale(RSS)score,postoperative emergence agitation/delirium(PEAD)score],and occurrence of adverse reactions during the recovery period were compared between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in duration of anesthesia induction and time to postoperative emergence between the two groups(P>0.05),nor significant difference in SBP,DBP,SPO2 and heart rate between the two groups at T0,T1,T2,T3 and T4(P>0.05).At 30 min after operation,epinephrine and cortisol in group R were lower than those in group P(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference in RSS score between group R and group P during the recovery period(P>0.05).The PAES score of group R was lower than that of group P(P<0.01),and there was no significant difference in the incidence of SpO2 reduction,nausea and vomiting,and drowsiness between the two groups(P>0.05).The incidence of agitation in group R was lower than that in group P(P<0.05).Conclusion The anesthetic effects of Remazolam combined with low-dose Esketamine and Propofol combined with low-dose Esketamine are comparable,both stabilizing intraoperative hemodynamics.However,the former is more effective in alleviating perioperative stress response and decreasing the incidence of emergence agitation.
许淑馨;包义勇
宣城市中心医院麻醉科,安徽宣城 242000宣城市中心医院麻醉科,安徽宣城 242000
艾司氯胺酮瑞马唑仑丙泊酚宫腔镜手术血氧饱和度肾上腺素皮质醇不良反应
EsketamineRemazolamPropofolhysteroscopic surgeryblood oxygen saturationadrenalinecortisoladverse reactions
《临床误诊误治》 2026 (2)
85-91,7
安徽省卫生健康科研项目(AHWJ2023A201893)2022年度宣城市卫生健康委科研项目(XCWJ2022015)
评论