首页|期刊导航|高校教育管理|多元制度情境下拔尖创新人才培养机制的类型学比较

多元制度情境下拔尖创新人才培养机制的类型学比较OA

A typological comparison of mechanisms for cultivating top innovative talents in diverse institutional contexts:a qualitative meta-analysis based on global cases

中文摘要英文摘要

拔尖创新人才培养机制反映了特定国家的制度结构与战略导向.采用质性元分析方法整合全球78 篇案例研究文献,构建"图式—资源"二维分析框架,归纳出四类典型机制:图式与资源双重充裕的精英孵化型、图式匮乏但资源富足的创新驱动型、图式充裕而资源短缺的国家主导型以及图式与资源双重匮乏的基础培育型.四种模式在选拔、组织、培养、资源与协同上存在制度与运行逻辑差异.各国培养模式的形成具有显著路径依赖特征,是在全球竞争与本土诉求张力下的制度选择.然而,四类机制既具有结构稳定性,也内嵌动态演化逻辑,图式与资源的协同变迁构成其模式转换的关键动力.中国应基于区域禀赋的分类差异化战略,构建内部多样且相互支持的人才培养体系.

Mechanisms for cultivating top innovative talents reflect the institutional structures and strategic orientations of specific nations.This study employs a qualitative meta-analysis to integrate 78 global cases,constructing a two-dimensional "schema-resource" analytical framework.It identifies four typical mechanisms:the"elite incubation type"with abundant schema and resources,the"innovation-driven type"with scarce schema but abundant resources,the"state-directed type"with abundant schema but scarce resources,and the"foundation cultivation type"with scarce schema and resources.The study reveals the institutional differences and operational logics of these four models in terms of selection,organization,cultivation,resources and synergy.The formation of national cultivation models exhibits significant path dependency,reflecting institutional choices made under the tension between global competition and domestic demands.Nevertheless,these four mechanisms possess not only structural stability but also an embedded logic of dynamic evolution.The synergistic change of schema and resources constitutes the key driving force for their model transformation.China should adopt a differentiated strategy based on regional endowments to establish an internal diverse and mutually supportive talent cultivation system.

李彦;孙元涛

浙江大学 教育学院,浙江 杭州 310058浙江大学 教育学院,浙江 杭州 310058

社会科学

拔尖创新人才"图式—资源"交互培养机制制度差异模式匹配质性元分析

top innovative talentsschema-resource interactioncultivation mechanisminstitutional differencesmodel matchingqualitative meta-analysis

《高校教育管理》 2026 (2)

51-61,124,12

国家社会科学基金教育学重大项目(VFA220003)

10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.1673-8381.2025-1680

评论